摘要
由于对个人信息权益的性质存在争议,我国《民法典》没有使用"个人信息权"的表述。从我国《民法典》对个人信息保护的规定来看,可以明确的是,自然人对其个人信息享有的是作为民事权益的人格权益,而非公法上的权利。自然人就其个人信息享有的人格利益和经济利益都可以通过作为人格权益的个人信息权益予以涵盖并保护,无需再确认作为财产权的个人信息权益。在我国法上,自然人就其个人信息所享有的民事权益是一项新型人格权益,其与隐私权在权利性质、许可使用、侵害行为以及处理规则等方面存在差异。对于作为隐私的私密信息首先适用隐私权的保护规则,法律对隐私权没有规定的,应适用个人信息保护的规定。
Due to controversies over the nature of the right and interest of personal information,the Civil Code of China(CCC) does not use the expression " Right of Personal Information". However,according to the provisions of CCC on the protection of personal information,it is clear that natural persons enjoy civil right and interest of personality rather than a right of public law over their personal information. Both the personality and economic interests enjoyed by natural persons with regard to their personal information could be protected and covered by the right and interest of personal information as a kind of personality right and interest,so there is no need to establish the property right for the right and interest of personal information. In laws of China,the civil right and interest enjoyed by natural persons over their personal information are a new kind of personality right and interest,which differs from the right to privacy in terms of the nature of right,authorized use,infringement and treatment rules. The private information as a kind of privacy should be protected by rules on the right to privacy. If there is no such protection,the provisions on personal information shall be applied.
出处
《政治与法律》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第8期2-14,共13页
Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“网络环境下民事权利的侵权法保护研究”(项目编号:18AFX016)的阶段性成果
关键词
民法典
自然人
个人信息
人格权益
隐私权
Civil Code
Natural Person
Personal Information
Personality Right and Interest
Right to Privacy
作者简介
程啸,清华大学法学院教授、博士研究生导师,教育部“青年长江学者”。
