摘要
人工智能技术热潮的再度兴起,使得人工智能法学研究空前繁盛,但当前研究出现了违反人类智力常识的反智化现象.概念附会现象严重,不少成果只是基于'AI+法律'的任意性组合,'泛人工智能化'研究正在产生大量学术泡沫;制造人工智能研究中的'假问题'或误将司法适用问题当作人工智能法学研究中的元问题,理论创新方向值得怀疑;将对策与科技问题当作理论与学术问题,离开法教义学的基本立场与方法,使得人工智能的研究日益滑向不可知论.人工智能并未对法律基础理论、法学基本教义提出挑战,受到挑战的只是如何将传统知识适用于新的场景.法学研究应该避免盲目跟风,走出对人工智能体的崇拜,回归学术研究的理性轨道.
Abstract:The resurgence of AI has brought unprecedented prosperity of AI legal science.However,there's an anti-intellectualization phenomenon in the study of AI legal science,which violates the common sense of human intelligence.The phenomenon of conceptually farfetched is particularly serious,which is mainly manifested in the fact that many results are based on the arbitrary combination of"AI+law"and the generalized AI research is producing a large number of academic bubbles.It is doubtful about the direction of theoretical innovation to make"false problems"in AI research or mistake judicial application as meta-problems in AI legal science research.Taking countermeasures and scientific and technological issues as theoretical and academic issues,which leaves the basic position and methods of legal dogmatics and makes the research of AI increasingly slide into agnosticism.AI has not challenged the basic theory and the basic doctrine of legal science,but the main challenge is how to apply traditional knowledge to new scenarios.Legal studyshould avoid following the trend blindly,so as to get out of the cargo worship of AI and return to the rational track of academic research.
出处
《东方法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第5期119-126,共8页
Oriental Law
基金
国家社科基金重大招标课题“大数据与审判体系和审判能力现代化研究”(项目批准号:17ZDA131)
东南大学人民法院司法大数据研究基地暨江苏高校“青蓝工程”
东南大学2019年中央基本科研业务费课题“大数据时代审判体系和审判能力现代化的理论基础与实践展开”(项目批准号:2242019S10003)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
人工智能法学
反智化
法教义学
Key words:AI legal science
anti-intellectualization
legal dogmatics
作者简介
刘艳红,东南大学法学院教授,博士生导师;教育部“长江学者奖励计划”特聘教授。
