摘要
关于“法典化意味着什么”的问题,需要从现实的法典化理论进路出发,以19世纪以后的法典化实践为基础,从政治、科学(学理)和技术三个视角进行探讨。首先,法典是政治的产物。近代的法典化有其独特的时代背景和政治意蕴,法典之争的背后总是伴随着政治角力,法典化现象本身则彰显着共和主义和立法中心主义的政治思潮。其次,法典是法学学术积淀的产物。近代的法典是法教义学的结晶和体系化方法的构造物,是形式化和实质化的双重体系的展现。最后,法典也是完备立法技术的产物。近代法典通常以论理体为体裁,既需设计符合民族和时代要求的体例,也需实现逻辑和经验的平衡。法典并非法律发展的终点,法典化是一个生生不息、不断成熟的动态过程,仰赖以法典评注和判例研究为支撑的教义学的发展。
As to the question about“what does codification mean”,it needs to be discussed from the realistic approach of codification theory,based on the practice of codification after the 19th century,and from the triple perspective of politics,science(academics)and skills.Firstly,the code is a product of politics.Modern codification had their own unique era background and political connotations.The disputes over the codification were always accompanied by political wrestling,and the phenomenon of codification itself demonstrated the political trend of republicanism and legislative centralism.Secondly,the code is a product of accumulation of legal scholarship.Modern codes were the crystallization of legal dogmatics and the construction of systematic methods,and were the manifestation of the dual system both of formalization and materialization.Finally,the code is also a product of adequate legislative skills.Modern codes usually took the theoretical style,and it is necessary to design a pattern that both meets the requirements of the nation and the times,as well as to achieve a balance between logic and experience.The code is not the end of legal development.Codification is an endless and ever maturing dynamic process,relying on the development of legal dogmatics supported by code commentaries and case studies.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第2期58-76,共19页
Law and Social Development
基金
北京市社会科学基金重大项目“数据科技时代法学基本范畴的体系重构”(20ZDA02)的阶段性成果
关键词
法典化
政治
科学(学理)
技术
动态过程
Code(Codification)
Politics
Science(Academics)
Skills
Dynamic Process
作者简介
雷磊,中国政法大学法学院教授。
