期刊文献+

环境法适度法典化:立法限度、规范表达与教义学构造 被引量:18

Modest-Scale Codification of Environmental Law:Legislative Limits,Normative Expressions,and Doctrinal Structures
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 适度法典化追求的灵活性与环境法典的稳定性存在张力,影响了法典编纂工作的进行。鉴于此,有必要从立法论和解释论的角度,厘清适度法典化。我国环境法治主要存在环境法律规范、环境法司法解释和环保党政规范性文件三种规范类型。通过对三者进入法典的识别,环境法典适度法典化可以划定立法的限度。在假定条件上,授权性规范和义务性规范要分情形明确,禁止性规范则应绝对明确;环境法典规范的行为准则要预留一定弹性和应急调整的空间;围绕法律后果,环境行政法律责任宜进行适度的体系化表达,环境法典生态环境责任编要进行绝对的体系化表达。适度法典化的教义学构造以环境法典条款和未进入法典的其他环境法律规范为基础,以环境法的指导性案例为补充,以传统生态文化和环境习惯法为外围助力。在划定适当的边界之后,环境法典的教义学方能形成适当的解释。 There is a tension between the flexibility pursued by modest-scale codification and the stability of the environmental code,which affects the progress of codification.In view of this,it is necessary to clarify the modest-scale codification from the perspectives of legislation theory and interpretation theory.There are mainly three types of norms in China's ecological and environmental rule of law:environmental legal norms,judicial interpretations of environmental laws,and party and government normative documents on environmental protection.Through the identification that which norms from the three should being included into the code,legislative limits can be determined for the moderate-scale codification.In terms of assumptive conditions,the standards for clarifying them of authorizing norms and obligatory norms should be determined according to different circumstances,while those for prohibitive norms must be absolutely clear.As for the rule of conduct in the norms of environment code,certain flexibility and space for emergency adjustment should be reserved;regarding the legal consequences,it is advisable to make systematic expression of environmental administrative legal liabilities in a modest manner and the section of eco-environmental liability of environmental code in an absolute way.The legal dogmatic structure of moderate-scale codification is based on the provisions of the environmental code and other environmental legal norms that have not been codified,supplemented by guiding cases of environmental law,and supported by traditional ecological culture and environmental customary law.Only after boundaries are properly delimited,can properly interpretation be formed in the dogmatics of the environmental code.
作者 程飞鸿 CHENG Feihong
出处 《政治与法律》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第6期110-126,共17页 Political Science and Law
基金 2019年国家社科基金重点项目“长江保护立法研究”(项目编号:19AFX023) 上海社会科学院创新工程“人与自然和谐共生的现代化研究”的阶段性成果
关键词 环境法典 适度法典化 规范类型 规范表达 法教义学 Environmental Code Modest-scale Codification Types of Norms Normative Expressions Legal Dogmatics
作者简介 程飞鸿,上海社会科学院法学研究所助理研究员、法学博士。
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

共引文献3079

同被引文献461

引证文献18

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部