摘要
立法技术是加强国家立法工作的重要保障。在刑事诉讼立法中嵌入法律技术要素,有助于提升立法的科学性,并为强化人权司法保障以及实现刑事诉讼法法典化提供方法引领。尽管我国刑事诉讼法已在编排技术、结构技术、语言技术、修法技术等方面形成了一些颇具特色且具有规律性的方法,但与民法、刑法等领域相比,立法技术仍显落后与稚嫩,难以全面落实人权保障的基本理念,阻碍了刑事诉讼法法典化的进程。面对《刑事诉讼法》再修改的动向,立法技术应当重点弥补在法源的整体性、结构的体系性、语言的严谨性、修法的协同性等方面的不足;通过体系思维的引领以及逻辑思维规则的运用,全面反映刑事程序法治的进步,充分彰显国家公权力的自我约束和对基本权利的优先保障。为了积极适应刑事诉讼法法典化的发展要求,应当遵循编纂式法典化的技术路径,基于审判中心重构立法体系,强化内在逻辑与外观表达,探索多元协同的修法方式,以此增强立法的整体性、体系性、严谨性、协同性。
Legislative technology is an important guarantee for strengthening national legislative work.Embedding legal technical elements in criminal procedure legislation is conducive to improving the scientific nature of legislation,and provides methodological guidance for strengthening the judicial protection of human rights and realizing the codification of criminal procedure.Although China's Criminal Procedure Law has formed some distinctive and regular methods in terms of arrangement technology,structure technology,language technology,and law revision technology,compared with the fields of civil law and criminal law,the legislative technology is still backward and immature,and it is difficult to fully implement the basic concept of human rights protection,which hinders the process of codification of criminal procedure.In the face of the trend of re-revision of the Criminal Procedure Law,legislative technology should focus on making up for the shortcomings in the integrity of the legal source,the systematization of the structure,the rigor of the language,and the coordination of the revision of the law.Through the guidance of systematic thinking and the application of logical thinking rules,it should comprehensively reflect the progress of the rule of law in criminal procedures,and fully demonstrate the self-restraint of state public power and the priority protection of basic rights.To actively adapt to the development requirements of codification of criminal procedure,the technical path of codification should be followed,the legislative system should be reconstructed based on the trial center,the internal logic and external expression should be strengthened,and multiple and coordinated ways of amending the law should be explored,so as to enhance the integrity,systematization,rigor and coordination of legislation.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第6期40-57,共18页
Law and Social Development
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大专项项目“中华优秀传统法律文化创造性转化、创新性发展与中国自主法学知识体系建构研究”(2023JZDZ013)的阶段性成果
关键词
刑事诉讼法
刑事诉讼法修改
立法技术
法典化
人权保障
Criminal Procedure Law
Revision of the Criminal Procedure Law
Legislative Technology
Codification
Human Rights Protection
作者简介
吴思远,华东政法大学刑事法学院副教授、硕士生导师。
