摘要
在数字时代,因个人信息泄露导致的侵害后果通常不以即时的人格减损、经济损失等形式表现出来,而更多地体现为以未来风险和内心焦虑为典型的新型损害,由此引发了个人信息泄露损害本体及其赔偿额的判定难题。就损害本体的判定而言,其目的是确认构成要件意义的个人信息泄露损害,应采纳合理侵害风险即构成客观损害的理念,取消精神损害严重性的救济要求,认可基于风险与焦虑的个人信息泄露损害的可救济性;就损害赔偿额的判定而言,其目的是在证成损害发生的基础上确认法律效果意义的个人信息泄露损害,可将风险预防费用、使用利益丧失、维权成本等纳入赔偿范围,构建个人信息泄露损害赔偿额的酌定因素及区间,以合理量化个人信息泄露损害数额。
In the digital age,the consequences of infringement caused by personal information breach are usually not in the form of immediate personality impairment and economic loss,but more in the form of the new type damage typified by future risk and inner anxiety,which leads to the difficulties in judging the existence and the amount of compensation of personal information breach damage.As for the judgment of the existence of damage,its purpose is to confirm the personal information breach damage in the sense of constitutive requirements.We should adopt the idea that reasonable infringement risk constitutes objective damage,cancel the relief requirements of the severity of mental damage,and recognize the relief possibility of personal information breach damage based on risk and anxiety.As for the judgment of the amount of damages,its purpose is to confirm the personal information breach damage in the sense of legal effect on the basis of proving the occurrence of damage.The risk prevention cost,loss of use interests and rights protection cost can be included in the scope of compensation,and the discretionary factors and interval of the amount of personal information breach damages can be constructed,so as to reasonably quantify the amount of personal information breach damages.
出处
《中山大学法律评论》
2021年第2期49-69,共21页
Sun Yatsen University Law Review
关键词
个人信息
信息泄露
风险损害
可救济性
损害赔偿
Personal Information
Information Breach
Risk Damage
Relief Possibilities
Damages
作者简介
时诚,西南政法大学民商法学院博士研究生,主要研究领域为民法学、信息法学。
