摘要
最近几年兴起的关于数字法学的讨论,致力于挑战既有法学的整体框架,其最终目标是实现整个法学的数字化。然而,如果注意到早已存在于法学中的概念工具,那么将发现这种“挑战”其实很难成功。这一方面是因为,由于数字法学极力主张自己的实践功能,所以它基本上只能属于应用法学的范畴;另一方面是因为,仅就应用法学而言,由于它必然建立在部门法划分的基础上,所以只要准确理解部门法划分的基本理论,就能发现数字法学最多只可能是某种特定的部门法学。具体来讲,由于公私法划分是法律性质的基本要求,所以数字法学只可能是公法学的具体部门,同时这有待于法律复合体的最终承认。
The discussion on digital jurisprudence that has arisen in recent years is committed to challenging the overall framework of the existing jurisprudence,and its ultimate goal is to realize the digitalization of the entire jurisprudence.However,if we pay attention to the conceptual tools that already exist in law,then this“challenge”is actually difficult to succeed.On the one hand,because digital jurisprudence strongly advocates its practical function,it can only belong to the category of applied jurisprudence;On the other hand,as far as applied jurisprudence is concerned,it must be based on the division of sectoral laws.Once the basic theory of the division of sectoral laws is accurately understood,digital jurisprudence can only be a specific area of law at most.Specifically,because the division of public and private law is the basic requirement of the legal nature,and digital jurisprudence can only be one of the specific areas of public law,and this needs the final recognition of legal complex.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第3期81-98,共18页
Law and Social Development
关键词
数字法学
公私法划分
公法
行政法
Digital Jurisprudence
Division of Private/Public Law
Public Law
Administrative Law
作者简介
陈景辉,中国人民大学法学院教授、中国人民大学未来法治研究院研究员。
