摘要
反兴奋剂治理中的数据处理活动因应技术变革对运动员进行深度的风险画像,需审慎对待运动员数据权益保护需求。现有“赋权—维权”模式表现出对隐私权保护的路径依赖,面临运动员信息自决实效受限和维权救济渠道不畅的问题,局限性日益凸显。鉴于权利让渡以及公共利益的信赖事实,在规制基础中引入“委托—受信”的信义关系,更有助于调适运动员与反兴奋剂组织的不平等地位,从而兼顾数据权益保护与合理的数据处理行为,增强反兴奋剂治理的公信力。为此,应以数据信义关系重塑运动员同意标准,要求反兴奋剂组织为运动员的数据利益妥为规划,对其施加数据风险审查和报告、第三方代理行为监管义务,并明确违反义务行为的救济措施,探索运动员数据权益保护的优化模式。
With technological changes,the data processing activities in anti-doping governance involve the in-depth risk profiles of athletes,and therefore it is necessary to treat the need to protect athletes'data rights and interests with caution.The existing model of"right granting-right protection"relies on the protection of privacy rights,facing such problems as the increasingly limited effectiveness of athletes'information self-determination and poor channels for safeguarding their rights.In view of the fact that athletes'rights are transferred and the public interest is entrusted,the introduction of the"entrust-fiduciary duty"relationship into the regulation foundation is more helpful to adjust the unequal status between athletes and anti-doping organizations,so as to balance the protection of data rights and the reasonable data processing behaviors,thus enhancing the credibility of anti-doping governance.Specifically,the consent standard of athletes should be reshaped based on the data fiduciary duty relationships:the anti-doping organizations shall review data risks and supervise the behaviors of third-party agents;remedies for the violation of obligations should also be clarified.Thus,the optimal mode of protecting athletes'data rights and interests will be gradually formed.
作者
魏沁宁
WEI Qinning(School of Law,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,Fujian,China)
出处
《上海体育大学学报》
北大核心
2025年第9期48-57,共10页
Journal of Shanghai University of Sport
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目(21BTY012)。
关键词
反兴奋剂组织
信义义务
运动员数据
数据权益
anti-doping organization
fiduciary duty
athletes'data
data rights and interests
作者简介
魏沁宁(ORCID:0000-0002-8500-3918),女,福建龙岩人,厦门大学博士研究生,研究方向:国际体育法、国际经济法,E-mail:weiqinning@126.com。
