期刊文献+

作为民法特别法的信托法 被引量:36

Trust Law as a Special Field of Civil Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 信托法作为英美舶来品,这一灵活、便利和普遍性的法律制度要在我国落地生根,应逐渐解决其与本土民商法制度的融合与协调问题。信托法是民法的特别法,其虽然挑战了传统民法的边界,但本质上是一个不折不扣的民法制度。自我国引进信托法律制度以来,学界和实务界从各个角度对信托法律制度本身及其存在的制度土壤等问题不断进行解释与质疑。对于信托法能否在缺乏英美衡平法传统的我国存身、信托关系作为信义关系的特殊性(法律关系)、信托的财产权结构兼容于我国的可能性(财产权)、信托和民事主体法及组织法的关系(主体法和组织法)、信托法提供的特殊救济观念(民事责任和救济)等基本理论问题的再认识,将使人们进一步理解信托法律制度之本旨与原貌、澄清其认识偏差甚至讹错,也能够使人们更加深刻理解信托法作为民事特别法的核心方面。 Trust law,as an imported product from common law countries,is a flexible,convenient and universal legal system.In order for it to take root in China,the problem of its integration and coordination with local civil and commercial law institutions must be gradually solved.Trust law is a special field of civil law.Although it challenges the boundary of traditional civil law,it is essentially a civil law institution.Since the introduction of the trust legal system into China,the Chinese academic and practical circles have been continuously interpreting and questioning from various perspectives the system itself and institutional soil on which it depends for its survival.This paper discusses the survival of trust law in China,the particularity of trust relationship as fiduciary relationship(legal relationship),the possibility of the structure of trust property right being compatible with Chinese legal system(property right),the relationship between trust and civil entity law and organizational law(entity law and organizational law),the special remedies(civil liabilities and remedies)provided by trust law and other basic theoretical issues,with a view to demonstrating the essential characteristics of trust law as a special civil law.
作者 赵廉慧 Zhao Lianhui
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第1期68-84,共17页 Global Law Review
作者简介 赵廉慧,中国政法大学民商经济法学院教授。
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献16

  • 1薛波.元照英关法词典[K].北京:法律出版社,2003:896.
  • 2张俊浩.民法学原理下册(修订第三版)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000:945.
  • 3[日]北川善太郎.民法讲要Ⅳ债权各论(第3版)[M].东京:有斐阁,2003:210-212.
  • 4Douglas Laycock, Modern American Remedies, Cases and materials [M]. third edition, 北京:中信出版社(影印本),2003:565.
  • 5[日]木下毅.日米比较原状回复法序说[C]//.四宫和夫先生古稀纪念论文集:民法·信托法理论的展开.东京:弘文堂,1986:127.
  • 6《德国民法典》第687条第2项.
  • 7台湾地区“民法典”第177条第2项.
  • 8[日]内田贵.《民法Ⅱ债权各沦》,第516页.
  • 9“台湾民法”第178条.
  • 10Attorney - General v Blake [2001 ] 1 AC 268.

共引文献17

同被引文献564

引证文献36

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部