摘要
信息隐私权的传统规范基础以个人为本位,以私人和公共为二分法,围绕空间、事物与主体维度,形成五种理论解释和六项概念核心。隐私的洛克范式与康德范式,晚近以来汇流为控制范式,成为当代信息隐私保护的核心原则。智能社会,特别是大数据技术,瓦解了控制范式的技术假设,进而对信息隐私权的规范基础形成全面冲击和挑战。技术巨变重构了社会图景,在空间、时间与社会维度引发隐私保护的深刻困境。需要从信息论和社会理论视角重新理解隐私,重构信息隐私权的规范基础:从个人本位转向社会本位;从控制范式转向信任范式;从独占维度转向沟通维度;从二元对峙转向一体多元;从权利视角转向权力视角;从概念独断转向语用商谈。在宪法时刻的时间意识下,为我国信息隐私法的未来发展寻找新的体系框架。
The traditional normative foundation of the right to information privacy is based on individualism,taking private and public as the dichotomy,centering on the dimensions of space,things,and subjects,forming five theoretical explanations and six conceptual cores.The Lockian paradigm and Kantian paradigm of privacy have recently converged into the control paradigm,which has become the core principle of contemporary information privacy protection.The intelligent society,especially the big data technology,dismantles the control paradigm’s technical assumptions,forming a comprehensive impact,and challenging the normative foundation of information privacy.Technological developments have reconstructed the social landscape,causing aprofound dilemma of privacy protection in the dimensions of space,time,and society.It is necessary to re-conceptualize privacy from the perspectives of information theory as well as social theory,and to reconstruct the normative basis of information privacy rights:from individual to social standards;from control paradigm to trust paradigm;from monopoly to communication;from dual confrontation to unity and pluralism;from the perspective of rights to the standpoint of power;from conceptual arbitrariness to pragmatic negotiation.Finally,under the constitutional moment’s imminence,this article discusses a new system framework for the future development of China’s information privacy law.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第1期32-56,共25页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
国家社科基金一般项目“第三波法律全球化范式变迁研究”(项目编号:20BFX008)的阶段性成果
关键词
信息隐私权
规范基础
体系重构
大数据技术
宪法时刻
Right to Informational Privacy
Normative Foundation
System Reconstruction
Big Data Technology
Constitutional Moment
作者简介
余成峰,北京航空航天大学高研院/法学院副教授。
