摘要
在技术加入的基础上,数据不再是人们实践活动的“副产品”,而是具有价值性、财产性的客体。在数据类型化的基础上,同时考虑数据来源、数据生成等多重要素,数据相关主体可享有数据权益。参考借鉴法律权利的构造等理论,根据利益、资格、自由行为和法律认可等构成要素,数据权益也存在类似的内部构造。在数据权益确定的前提下,数据权益之间可能存在冲突,如何在不同数据权益之间进行比较,进而判断哪一数据权益更优,“动态比较”思维方法应当更好总结提炼并予以适用,以此从静态和动态两个维度观察数据权益、构造数据权益。
On the basis of the addition of technology,data is no longer a byproduct of people's practical activities,but a valuable and property oriented object.On the basis of data typing,while considering multiple factors such as data sources and data generation,data subjects can have data rights.Referring to the construction of legal rights and other theories,data rights also have similar internal structures based on the constituent elements of interests,qualifications,free behavior,and legal recognition.Under the premise of determining data rights and interests,there may be conflicts between data rights and interests.How to compare different data rights and determine which data right is better?The"dynamic comparison"method should be better summarized and applied to observe data rights and construct data rights from both static and dynamic dimensions.
出处
《中国应用法学》
CSSCI
2023年第3期42-53,共12页
China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“大数据时代个人数据保护与数据权利体系研究”(项目批准号:18ZDA146)的阶段性成果。
作者简介
姚佳,中国社会科学院大学教授、中国社会科学院法学研究所编审、博士生导师。
