摘要
《刑法》第13条的“但书”规定〔1〕有着重要的司法价值,当前犯罪构成理论体系下直接援引“但书”规定出罪并不违背罪刑法定原则。本文以公开的157份援引“但书”规定出罪的裁判文书为样本,分析司法实践中“但书”规定的适用状况及存在的问题,进而从裁判文书规范说理的视角论述“但书”的规范适用及释法说理,即前提条件——存在但书的适用空间、逻辑位阶——社会危害性让位于刑事违法性、规范说理——回归立法本意进行实质违法性判断。
The provision of proviso in Art.13 of the criminal law has important judicial value and directly citing the proviso does not violate the principle of legality in current criminal constitution system.This article,taking the 157 non-guilty judgments citing the proviso as samples,analyzes the application situation and problems of the provision of proviso,discusses the normative application and interpretation of proviso in the perspective of normative reasoning of judgments,that is,the premise:there is an applicable space for proviso,logic rank:social harmfulness gives way to criminal illegality,normative reasoning:judge the substantive illegality with the original intention of legislation.
出处
《中国应用法学》
2020年第1期133-149,共17页
China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence
关键词
但书
文书说理
实质违法性
proviso
reasoning of judgments
substantive illegality
作者简介
刘树德,最高人民法院审管办工作人员、法学博士;潘自强,上海市第一中级人民法院刑事审判庭法官助理。
