摘要
在追求法律效果与社会效果有机统一的法治实践背景下,聚焦个案纠纷解决的传统范式已不足以展示司法裁判功能的全貌。基于效果最佳化的需要,司法裁判还承载着塑造公共政策的独特功能。从可能性来看,司法裁判塑造公共政策功能的发挥取决于三个基本条件是否得到满足,即面向社会大众的公共性、辐射社会大众的权威性以及引导社会大众的规范性。司法裁判的功能扩张并非盲目的,而是基于对司法与社会交互背景下被动因素和能动因素的综合考量。为防止操作不当引发正义失衡和越法裁判的消极后果,需从方法上作出相应建构,以此对法官形成正确引导和合理约束。基于过程论视角分析,司法裁判塑造公共政策的方法由公共政策预测、公共政策选择和公共政策合法化三阶要素构成。
In the context of the rule of law,which seeks the organic unity of legal and social effects,the traditional paradigm that focuses solely on resolving individual disputes is no longer adequate to depict the overall function of judicial adjudication.To optimize its effects,judicial adjudication must also play a unique role in shaping public policy beyond individual case.In terms of possibilities,the realization of this function hinges on three basic conditions:the publicity for the public at large,the authority to impact the public at large broadly,and the normativity to guide the public at large.The expansion of the function of judicial adjudication is not blind,and it reflects a comprehensive consideration of both passive and active factors within the context of the interaction between judicial adjudication and society.To prevent the negative consequences of justice imbalance and lawless judging,it is essential to establish proper methodological frameworks.This will provide correct guidance and reasonable constraints for judges.From a procedural perspective,the method of shaping public policy through judicial adjudication involves three elements:public policy prediction,public policy selection,and public policy legalization.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第4期37-57,共21页
Law and Social Development
基金
河南省软科学研究计划项目“诉源治理的理论逻辑与实践路径研究”(242400411128)的阶段性成果
关键词
司法裁判
公共政策塑造
条件分析
合理性阐释
方法建构
Judicial Adjudication
Shaping of Public Policy
Analysis of Conditions
Interpretation of Reasonableness
Construction of Method
作者简介
马光泽,河南大学法学院讲师、硕士生导师。
