期刊文献+

刑法司法解释应对新型科技犯罪的逻辑、立场与路径 被引量:8

The Logic, Attitude and Approach of Criminal Law Judicial Interpretation in Dealing with New Technology Crimes
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 新型科技犯罪给司法实践带来了定罪和量刑的困难,而对新型科技犯罪的认定将影响新型科技的发展。刑法司法解释是指引新型科技犯罪认定的有效手段,已经形成了基本的逻辑体系,但存在不足并受到质疑。为应对新型科技犯罪,刑法司法解释应当发挥调节定罪量刑标准的优势,把握刑法介入科技领域的广度和力度,并采用主观解释兼客观解释的解释立场。新型科技犯罪司法解释的制定应当严格遵循合法性、合理性、明确性和必要性等规范化标准,注重目的解释方法,引入技术性解释。 New technology crimes bring difficulties to the judicial practice in terms of conviction and sentencing,and the identification of new technology crimes will affect the development of science and technology.The judicial interpretation of criminal law is an effective means to guide the identification of new technology crimes,has formed a basic logical system,and are questioned due to deficiencies.In order to deal with new technology crimes,the judicial interpretation of criminal law should give full play to the advantage of adjusting the standards of conviction and sentencing,grasp the breadth and intensity of criminal law’s intervention in the field of science and technology,and adopt the subjective interpretation and objective interpretation.The formulation of the judicial interpretation of the criminal law of new technology crimes should strictly follow the standards of legality,rationality,clarity and necessity,pay attention to the purposive interpretation method,and introduce technical interpretation.
作者 林雨佳
机构地区 上海大学法学院
出处 《东方法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第3期115-128,共14页 Oriental Law
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“网络时代的社会治理与刑法体系的理论创新”(项目批准号:20&ZD199)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 刑法司法解释 新型科技犯罪 解释立场 规范化标准 技术性解释 目的解释 judicial interpretation of criminal law new technology crimes interpretation attitude normalized standards technical interpretation,purposive interpretation
作者简介 林雨佳,上海大学法学院讲师,法学博士。
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

二级参考文献473

共引文献1745

同被引文献241

引证文献8

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部