摘要
证明对象海量化以及证据与罪量的证明关系发生变化,使得在打击网络黑灰产犯罪时,对其罪量的司法证明问题成为当前的最大难题。现有罪量司法证明应对方案没有给予中国司法实践中的经验事实以足够关注。在对现有方案检讨的基础上,通过对有关两高指导性案例、《最高人民法院公报》《刑事审判参考》及相关典型案例的系统梳理发现,对于网络黑灰产犯罪罪量的司法证明,我国司法机关业已形成了一套证明方法,其分为三个环节:公诉方基于综合认定得出推定数量;辩护方针对推定数量承担证明责任;公诉方对反驳进一步承担证明责任。
In the cases relating to cyber underground industry,the quantity of crimes needs to be proved.The relationship between evidence and the quantity of crimes is different from that of the traditional crimes,making it more difficult to prove and fight against the crimes.This has become the most challenging problem in practice.Existing strategies for solving this problem have paid scant attention on experience from China’s judicial practice.On the basis of analyzing current solutions,this article will examine the guiding cases released by the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuracy,as well as their bulletins and criminal trial reference,and find that we have formed a set of mechanism for proving the quantity of crimes relating to cyber black productions,which is divided into three aspects:the prosecutor presume the quantity in accordance to overall facts and evidence;the defense produce the evidence to rebut the presumption;and the prosecutor produce the evidence the rebut the defense’s argument.
作者
吉冠浩
Ji Guanhao(Law School of Beihang University)
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第1期55-71,共17页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
中国科协2020年高端科技创新智库青年项目“数据跨境流动国际治理体系研究”(25400002020120004)
北京航空航天大学2020年人文社科拔尖人才支持计划“公平审判原则的规范结构研究”(501WKQB2020120014)的阶段性成果
关键词
网络黑灰产犯罪
罪量
司法证明
间接证据
事实推定
Crimes Relating to Cyber Underground Industry
Quantity of Crimes
Judicial Proof
Indirect Evidence
Factual Presumption
作者简介
吉冠浩,北京航空航天大学法学院讲师、法学博士。
