摘要
国家监察体制改革及2018年刑事诉讼法修改使检察侦查权大幅弱化,检察机关的侦查权走向了全面机动化。以原办案机关是否存在违法或懈怠等"错误"为前提,机动侦查可区分为迳行侦查与续行侦查两种模式。其中,续行侦查模式侧重于遏制原办案机关的不作为,在实践价值、施行难度、可操作性、社会效益等方面具备迳行侦查所难以比拟的诸多优势。检察侦查权目前已放弃迳行侦查模式,但却尚未做好有效实施续行侦查模式的制度准备。为构筑行之有效的续行侦查格局,我们必须简化对"侦查、调查不作为"从责任判定到程序推定的认定标准;改良决策程序,创设利害关系人"申诉前置"机制;谨慎对待前期侦办结论,借以改良检察侦查权的启动标准、决策程序和法律效果。
The reform of the national supervisory system and the amendment of criminal procedure law in 2018 have greatly weakened procuratorial and investigation power, and procuratorial organs are flexible in the use of investigation power. Based on whether the original case-handling authority has committed illegal or slack "errors", procuratorial organs are flexible to choose direct investigation or follow-up investigation. The follow-up investigation mode focuses on curbing the inaction of the original investigation authorities, and has many advantages incomparable to direct investigation in terms of practical value, implementation difficulty, operability and social benefits,but it is not ready to effectively implement the follow-up investigation mode at the institutional level. In order to build an effective pattern of follow-up investigation, it is necessary to take following measures: simplify the determination criteria for liability judgment and procedure presumption in "inaction detection and investigation";improve decision procedure and set up a mechanism for interested parties to"appeal in advance";treat the conclusion of preliminary investigations with caution, so as to improve the starting standard,decision-making procedure and legal effect of procuratorial investigation power.
作者
郭晶
GUO Jing(College of Law and Criminology,Chinese People's Public Security University,Beijing,100038)
出处
《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期99-109,共11页
Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
基金
中国法学会部级项目“刑事‘未破’案件处理机制研究”(CLS(2018)D103)
中国人民公安大学基本科研业务费项目“刑事诉讼程序运行期间与未决羁押持续期间之制度关系研究”(2018JKF603)
关键词
检察侦查权
机动侦查
续行侦查
迳行侦察
制度准备
procuratorial investigation power
mobile investigation
follow-up investigation
direct investigation
system preparation
作者简介
郭晶,法学博士,中国人民公安大学法学与犯罪学学院讲师,主要从事诉讼法学、证据法学及司法制度研究。