摘要
检察侦查是检察机关履行诉讼监督与刑事控诉职能的重要体现,是保障监督刚性、客观公正追诉犯罪的必要制度安排。监察体制改革后,我国检察机关的侦查权包括直接侦查权、机动侦查权和自行补充侦查权等三种类型。囿于规范层面的局限以及相关配套措施的欠缺,检察侦查权的制度支撑严重不足。实务中,检察侦查面临直接侦查窒碍难行、机动侦查形骸化以及自行补充侦查异化等现实困境,致使其诉讼监督效果并不理想,难以对侦查(调查)权形成有效制约,所谓优化指控证据体系、审前案件“筛漏”功能亦浮于形式。为促使检察侦查权真正回归“法律守护者”和诉讼权力“中介”性质,有必要在《刑事诉讼法》的新一轮修法中对其予以体系化重塑。
Prosecutorial investigation is an important manifestation of the prosecutorial organs fulfilling their functions of litigation supervision and criminal prosecution,as well as a necessary institutional arrangement of guaranteeing the rigidity of supervision,objective and fair prosecution of crimes.Due to the limitations of regulations and the lack of relevant supporting measures,institutional support for prosecutorial investigation power is extremely insufficient.In practice,prosecutorial investigation faces difficulties such as obstacles in direct investigation,the formalization of prosecutorial flexible investigation,and the alienation of voluntary supplementary investigation.As a result,litigation supervision is unsatisfactory without effective constraints on the investigation power,and the so-called optimization of the accusatory evidence system and the pre-trial“screening”are also superficial.Thus,it is necessary to systematically reshape the prosecutorial investigation power in the new round of amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law.
出处
《公安学研究》
CSSCI
2024年第3期17-32,123,共17页
Journal of Public Security Science
基金
国家社会科学基金重点课题“认罪认罚案件的事实认定方式与卷证制度研究”(20AFX015)
作者简介
张青(1985—),男,云南大学法学院副院长、教授、博士研究生导师,法学博士(昆明650091)
