摘要
《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》专章规定了环境污染民事责任,实际上也包括生态破坏行为类型,形成了统一的环境民事责任。但由于这一领域同时涉及环境法和民法两个部门法,出于不同的诉求,对环境污染责任的适用范围,尤其是环境污染责任应否承担起保护环境生态利益的重任这一问题,理论上仍存有争议。在生态利益的保护方面,私法的救济手段有其优势,但自权利角度将其规定在私法中与私权体系相悖。值得借鉴的方案是在《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》中设置一项拟制条款,将政府或有关主管机关因生态损害而遭受的不利负担视为侵权责任法中的损害,可使私法肩负起对生态利益的保护重任。
The Tort Liability Law stipulates the civil liability for environmental pollution in a special chapter with ecological destruction actually included,thus bringing into being a unified environmental liability system. Due to the involvement of both the environmental and the civil laws with different demands,there are theoretical disputes over the legal scope of the environmental liability,and whether the environmental liability law should assume the responsibility of protecting the ecological interests,in particular. The remedy of private law is good for protecting ecological interests,and yet claiming rights for ecological interests in the private law system will lead to confusion in the private rights system. A better solution is to provide a fictitious clause in The Tort Liability Law,so that the burden,as a result of ecological damage and borne by the authorities in charge,is to be taken as equivalent to the damage in The Tort Liability Law. Only in this way can the private law take on the task of protecting the ecological interests.
出处
《南京大学学报（哲学．人文科学．社会科学）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第1期49-60,159,共13页
Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
