摘要
依据法源属性,我国判例可分为指导性案例、示范性案例以及一般性判例三种类型,其法源属性分别为约束性法源、引导性法源和智识性法源。作为约束性法源的指导性案例,其功能主要体现为丰富司法规范体系结构,完善司法规范体系;作为引导性法源的示范性案例,其功能主要设定于重构司法见解控制体系,保障法律适用统一;作为智识性法源的一般性判例,其功能应定位于通过泛在的司法经验与智慧的流动,推动司法经验与智慧的共享。这种功能定位格局,使得我国判例运用既不同于英美判例法国家的制度与实践,也与法、德等欧陆成文法国家具有重要差异。
From the perspective of the application,the judicial precedents in China could be classified into three categories:guiding cases,exemplary cases and ordinary cases.And correspondingly,each category is respectively characterized by its nature as a binding source,a guiding source and an intellectual source of law.As a binding source of law,the function of guiding cases is mainly embodied as enriching the structure of and improving the judicial norm system.As a guiding source of law,the function of exemplary cases is mainly set as reconstructing the judicial opinion control system and guaranteeing the unity of law application.As an intellectual source of law,the function of ordinary cases should be to promote the sharing of judicial experience and wisdom through widespread communication of them.The function orientation pattern makes the judicial precedent application in China not only different from the system and practice of Anglo-American case law countries but also different from statutory states in Europe such as France and Germany.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第4期5-24,共20页
China Legal Science
基金
2018年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“我国成文法体制下判例运用的理论与实践”(项目批准号:18ZDA138)的阶段性成果。
作者简介
顾培东,四川大学法学院教授。
