摘要
自主人工智能体不应成为相关人员逃避刑事责任的"替罪羊",应"刺破人工智能面纱",根据现行刑法直接追究相关人的刑事责任。而未来社会直接追究智能机器人刑事责任的观点,也不具有可行性,因为这将完全颠覆现行刑法,主要是要求机器人遵守机器人三原则将使刑法陷入各种全新的道德困境;刑法在规制犯罪危险来源的智能机器人时会显得软弱无力;同时,刑法固有的传统性、保守性、谦抑性等也将荡然无存。目前看来,我国对智能机器人作为刑事责任主体的观点,也应予以否定,事实上无论将智能机器人类比为现有何种类型的责任主体都存在疑问,对智能机器人施加刑事制裁也无法实现刑罚目的,而且智能机器人难以同人类一样遭受刑法上的道德责难。
Autonomous AI Entity should not be ″the scapegoat″ of related persons escaping criminal responsibility.We must ″pierce the AI mask″,and related persons should be directly held criminally liable for the wrongdoing of AI Entity.In the future,making AI Entity culpability subject is not applicable as well,since it will subvert current Criminal Law and lead to the brand-new moral dilemma,and criminal law will seem dramatically week in the front of strong powerful AI Robot.Meanwhile,the inherent traits of current Criminal Law will vanish.Currently,we should refute the assertation of making AI Entity culpability subject,because no matter which type culpability subject that we regard the AI Entity as,we could not achieve the punishment goals,and AI Robot could not suffer the intense moral censure in criminal law as human.
出处
《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》
2019年第2期109-115,共7页
Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金
广州大学律师学院课题(lsxy-2017002)资助成果
关键词
人工智能
刑事责任
人工智能体
智能机器人
犯罪主体
法人
artificial intelligence
criminal responsibility
AI Entity
AI Robot
criminal subject
legal person
作者简介
胡莎,广州大学法学院讲师,法学博士,从事刑法学研究。
