摘要
人与人工智能存在根本性的区别,人工智能本质上属于人类的创作工具,人工智能不具备法律主体的构成要件,缺乏拟制为法律主体的可行性。对人工智能生成物的可版权性的判定,应以"独创性"作为判断标准。在人工智能生成物创作中,人工智能替代或减轻的是人的脑力劳动,人工智能对人工智能生成物的贡献,不能完全取代和否定人对作品的独创性贡献。对人工智能生成物的权利分配,应平衡操作者、设计者、雇主、委托人及相关公众之间等主体之间的利益。人工智能作为创作辅助工具,在一般场合,人工智能生成物的著作权归属于创作者所有。鉴于人工智能生成物的创作具备高风险、高投资的特征,在雇主与委托人等投资人参与的特殊场合,其著作权归属于人工智能投资者是最为经济的一种处理方式。
There is a fundamental difference between human and artificial intelligence,and artificial intelligence is still the creation tool of human beings.It is infeasible to make artificial intelligence into a legal subject for the lack of the constitutive requirement of the legal subject.The judgement of the legal property of artificial intelligence products should use originality as the standard of judgment.In the creation of artificial intelligence products,artificial intelligence can replace or reduce the person's brainwork in some degree.However,the contribution to the originality of products of human bein g cannot be completely replaced by the contribution of artificial intelligence.The right allocation of artificial intelligence products should balance the interests among operators,designers,employers,pr incipals,the relevant public and other relevant subjects.In general,artificial intelligence is used as a creation tool of human beings,the copyright of artificial intelligence products belongs to the creator.In view of the features of high risk and high investment of the creation of the artificial intelligence products,it is one of the most economical ways that the copyright of products belongs to the investor of artificial intelligence when the employers,principals,and other investors are involved.
出处
《电子知识产权》
CSSCI
2018年第6期31-43,共13页
Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词
人工智能生成物
创作工具
可版权性
权利分配
Artificial Intelligence Products
Creative Tools
Copyrightability
Right Allocation
作者简介
李晓宇,中山大学法学院博士生。
