摘要
著作权法以鼓励创作为目的,只有人才能理解和利用著作权法的激励机制,因此只有人的创作成果才能作为作品受到著作权法的保护,认为作品不必来自于人的“独创性客观说”不能成立。著作权法将作者之外的其他民事主体拟制为作者,前提是存在自然人创作的作品。以可将人工智能或其研发者、使用者拟制为作者为由,认定人工智能生成的内容为作品的观点不合逻辑。人工智能的研发者和使用者均不能基于自由意志直接决定人工智能生成的内容,因此该内容并非由人类以人工智能为工具创作的内容。由于对人工智能生成的内容的利用有其不同于作品利用的商业模式,不将其认定为作品不会影响对人工智能技术的投资,也不会违反权利与义务相统一的理念。
The purpose of copyright law is to encourage creation,and only humans can understand and utilize the incentive mechanism of copyright law.Therefore,only human’s creative achievements can be protected by copyright law as works,and the“Objective Originality Theory”that argues works do not need to come from humans is untenable.The copyright law may treat a person or legal entity other than the real author as the author,but such a legal fi ction is based on the fact that there exists a work created by a natural person.So it is illogical view that the content generated by artifi cial intelligence constitutes work just because the developer or the user may be recognized as the author by the copyright law.Both developers and users of artifi cial intelligence cannot directly determine the content generated by artifi cial intelligence based on their free will,so this content is not created by humans using artifi cial intelligence as a tool.Due to the diff erent business models of utilizing the content generated by artifi cial intelligence from utilizing the work of authorship,not recognizing the content as a work will not aff ect investment in artifi cial intelligence technology,nor will it violate the concept of the unity of rights and obligations.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第4期16-33,共18页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“媒体融合中的版权理论与运用研究”(19ZDA330)的阶段性成果
作者简介
王迁,华东政法大学法律学院教授。
