摘要
大数据和人工智能技术凸显了法律人格边界模糊和结构性不平等加大等问题,须在主体性原则的理论层次上才能有效处理。主体性原则是现代法权体系构建的根本原则,具体体现为"自由原则"的核心原则,以及"理性原则"和"人文原则"两个基础原则。网络空间的发展,开显了更高层次的人类自由——"积极自由"的可能性路径,同时也面临"消极自由"受到侵害的现实威胁,二者构成自由理论的内在矛盾。网络空间的层次性,错开了"积极自由"和"消极自由"的直接对立;网络空间的开放性,要求确立网络隐私权在落实主体性原则方面的基础性地位;网络空间的系统性,要求强化对算法的审查和监管。
Principle of subjectivity is the fundamental principle for the construction of modern legal force. It is concretely embodied in the principle of freedom as the core principle, and the humanistic principle and the rational principle as the two basic principles. Big data and artificial intelligence technology highlight the questions of boundary ambiguity of legal personality and increase of structural inequality, which only in the theoretical level of the subjectivity can we dealt with effectively. The development of cyberspace shows the possibility of the path of human freedom in higher level, that is, ＂positive freedom＂, but it faces the real threat to ＂negative freedom＂ at the same time, and the two form the inherent contradictions of the freedom theory. The hierarchical structure of cyberspace eliminates the direct opposition between ＂positive freedom＂ and ＂negative freedom＂ ; the openness of the cyberspace requires the establishment of the basic position of the network privacy in the implementation of the principle of subjectivity; The systematic nature of cyberspace requires that the algorithm be reviewed and supervised.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期71-88,共18页
China Legal Science
作者简介
中国人民大学金融科技与互联网安全研究中心副研究员。
