摘要
在我国,回溯性地将责任承担方式作为判断数人侵权之共同诉讼类型的标准,难以直接有效地明晰受害人起诉和法院审理中所面临的诉讼主体问题。鉴于因果关系在实体法上是连接侵权行为和损害结果之间的桥梁,也是受害人起诉和法院裁判时所依据的重要内容,因此,紧扣因果关系核心,在尊重并正视程序的流动变化特性的基础上,关注原告可以如何提出诉讼请求、可以向谁提出请求、需要怎样的证明、法院可以如何审判等程序性问题,明确不同类型因果关系的数人侵权所适用的共同诉讼类型是不同的。最后,根据因果关系是单一或多元的标准,将多种数人侵权类型与多种共同诉讼类型依次对应,以厘清并细化数人侵权的共同诉讼问题。
According to joint liability or proportionate liability, it is difficult to judge which kind of joint action should be applied in multiple tortfeasors lawsuit. Specifically, since the plaintiff and the court may not be able to clearly judge the kind of responsibility at the beginning of the lawsuit, the defendant whom be accused by the plaintiff and the person whom be liable for the judgment may be different. How- ever, causality is linking the torts and the infringement of facts in substantive law; it can also serve as a link between litigants＂ claim and court＇s judgment in litigation. On the basis of the development of the lit- igation procedure, we can take into account that causality is an important factor in multiple tortfeasors litigation. This article matches each type of multiple tortfeasors to different types of joint actions by dis- tinguishing single causality or complex causality.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期1252-1266,共15页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
2017年教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"多数人侵权纠纷共同诉讼类型研究"(项目编号:17YJC820034)
2016年教育部人文社会科学项目基金"虚假诉讼防控机制实证研究"(项目编号:16YJA820001)的阶段性成果
关键词
数人侵权
因果关系
共同诉讼
类似必要共同诉讼
Multiple Tortfeasors
Causality
Joint Action
Similar Indispensable Joint Action
作者简介
中山大学法学院博士后。
