摘要
传统民法学研究对于民法的裁判规范属性未给予足够重视。这种学理局限在遭遇民法典在裁判规范问题上的“准备不足”时又被加剧和放大,对此有必要引入作为“裁判规范之民法”的要件事实论予以克服,从而实现实体与程序的顺畅衔接。借鉴要件事实论的“请求原因不同则诉讼标的不同”等思维并结合对于民法典合同编通则上规范群的解释,可以探索识别和区分请求权的标准从而构建完善的请求权体系。借鉴要件事实论的“原则/例外”等思维并结合《民法典》第235条等规范群的解释,可以思考要件事实的法解释学操作流程从而建立妥当的“请求原因/抗辩/再抗辩”的要件事实体系。
Traditional studies of Civil Law have not paid sufficient attention to the adjudication norms of civil law.This limitation of doctrine will be aggravated and magnified when encountering the“inadequate preparation”of the Civil Code on the issue of adjudication norms,and it is necessary to introduce the ultimate facts theory as the“civil law of adjudication norms”to overcome this problem in order to further achieve a smooth connection between substances and procedures.By referring to the principle of“different object of litigation for different causes of claim”of the Civil Code and combining the interpretation of the general rules of the Contracts Book of the Civil Code,the standard for identifying and distinguishing claims can be explored,so as to build a complete claim system.Drawing on the thinking pattern of“principle/exception”of the ultimate facts and the interpretation of the norm groups such as Article 235 of the Civil Code,consideration can be taken to the legal hermeneutic operation process of ultimate facts so as to establish a proper system of“cause of claim/defence/counter defence”.
作者
王倩
袁中华
Wang Qian;Yuan Zhonghua(Law School of Hubei University of Economics;Law School of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law)
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第2期161-176,共16页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
2020年国家社科基金项目“要件事实论视野下《民法典》合同编的解释与反思”(20BFX117)的阶段性成果
关键词
要件事实论
请求权体系
请求原因
抗辩
再抗辩
Ultimate Facts Theory
System of Rights of Claim
Cause of Claim
Defence
Counter Defence
作者简介
王倩,湖北经济学院副教授;袁中华,中南财经政法大学教授。
