摘要
以主张责任的视角审视,可以发现大量实务案件中原告的事实主张都存在不恰当或者不充分的问题,对此最为恰当的司法应对措施为诉的正当性审查制度。诉的正当性审查原理要求原告应当就其承担主张及证明责任的事实进行实质性主张。其相关的审查、释明和驳回诉讼请求等制度构建的理论基础则在于辩论主义、法律观点指出义务以及诉讼效率。为更好地提升诉讼效率和诉讼公正,应当建立诉的正当性审查制度及其相应的配套的争点整理程序,并从解释学上明晰事实主张的具体化要求,以及民法典中核心请求权基础规范的要件事实。
From the perspective of the burden of opinion,we can find that the plaintiffs factual claims in many cases in Chinas judicial practice are inappropriate or inadequate.The most appropriate judicial response to this is the legitimacy censorship system of the lawsuit.The principle of the censorship of the legitimacy of the action requires the plaintiff to make a substantive opinion on the facts that he bears the burden of proof and claim.The theoretical basis of the relevant system construction of censorship,interpretation and rejection of claims lies in the doctrine of proposing,the obligation of legal point of view and the efficiency of litigation.In order to improve the efficiency and justice of litigation,we should establish the censorship of the legitimacy of claim and the procedure of sorting out issues in contention,and clarify the concrete requirement of factual claim and the essential facts of the central claim in the civil code from the perspective of hermeneutics.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第2期386-404,共19页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
国家社科基金“请求权视角下民事诉讼与民法典问题对接研究”(项目编号:19BFX082)的中期研究成果
关键词
正当性审查
主张责任
要件事实
法律观点指出义务
Legitimacy Censorship
Burden of Opinion
Essential Facts
Legal Obligations of Specification
作者简介
袁中华,中南财经政法大学法学院副教授。
