摘要
现实生活中,司法裁判承载着纠纷解决、社会行为规范、社会价值引导等多元功能。因此,裁判文书应当充分发挥其说理特性,将案件争议、事实、证据与法律规则之间的关联及其相互影响进行精确的分析和阐释。裁判说理的好坏,主要取决于说理能力、说理环境以及说理载体。现阶段,我国应当将完善说理载体作为加强裁判说理的首要路径。完善说理载体,不应盲目采取司法移植的路径,而应当在参考域外经验的基础上,对我国说理载体的"构件"进行拆分,并以现行民事诉讼立法和裁判说理的规律为指导,对拆分后的"要素"进行重组,继而准确定位重组后各"构件"的功能,创制出有利于说理的文书载体形式,提升我国裁判的说理性。
In real life,the judicial adjudication carries many functions such as dispute resolution,social behavior norm and social value guidance. Therefore,the judgment document should give full play to its reasoning characteristics. It is very necessary to analyse and interpret the relationship among the disputes,the facts,the evidences and the legal rules. Judgment reasoning is based on many factors,such as the ability of reasoning,the condition of reasoning,and the carrier of reasoning. At this stage,we should perfect the reasoning carrier as the primary way to strengthen the judgment reasoning in our country. We should not blindly take the path of judicial transplantation as the way to perfect the reasoning carrier,the best way to perfect the reasoning carrier is on the basis of foreign experience,splitting the reasoning carrier and recombining it with the guidance of the current civil procedure legislation and the judgment reasoning rule. After this,the function of each component should be accurately positioned,and the reasoning of Chinese civil judgment will be improved.
出处
《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期83-88,共6页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词
裁判功能
裁判说理
文书改革
the functions of judicial decisions
judgment reasoning
reform of judicial documents
作者简介
杨翔（1964-）,男,湖南汨罗人,湘潭大学法学院博士生导师,湖南省高级人民法院副院长.
奉鑫庭（1990-）,男,湖南永州人,湘潭大学法学院博士研究生.
