摘要
我国刑法中并未出现与德日刑法中的"正犯"、"共犯"、"共同正犯"、"帮助犯"含义相同的词语,明显不是采取传统的区分制犯罪参与体系;把我国刑法有关共同犯罪的规定解释为采取"归责区分制"或"双层区分制",从而将其纳入区分制体系范畴的变通做法,也不具有科学合理性。我国刑法采取的犯罪参与体系是单一制,但既不是"功能性的单一正犯体系",也不是"二元的形式单一正犯体系",而是典型的"形式的单一正犯体系"。
There are no words in China’s criminal law that have the same meaning as the"principal","accomplice","co-perpetrator",and"accessory"in German and Japanese criminal law.Obviously,China’s criminal law does not adopt the traditional differentiated system of crime participation as Germany and Japan do.The idea,that interprets the system of criminal participation adopted in China’s criminal law as the"liability differentiated system"or the"double level differentiated system",thus bringing the system into the category of the differentiated system,ignores the qualitative difference between the reformed"differentiated system"and the traditional one;the reformed one should not be categorized as the differentiated system.The system of criminal participation adopted in China’s criminal law is a typical single principal system,which is not a functional single principal system nora single principal system with binary form.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第4期83-97,共15页
Law Review
关键词
犯罪参与
参与体系
区分制
单一正犯
Crime Participation
Participation System
Differentiated System
Single Principal System
作者简介
刘明祥,中国人民大学法学院教授。
