数据安全风险的社会自我规制及其合宪性控制被引量：12

The Social Subject Self-regulation of The Data Security Risk And Its Constitutionality Control

导出

摘要数据安全风险的社会自我规制关涉风险规制责任的分配、国家的干预限度、社会主体的基本权利及责任边界等一系列宪法问题,有必要进行合宪性控制。现行法律中数据安全风险的社会自我规制方式主要包括组织性规制、行为性规制、协助性规制和伦理性规制。四类规制方式均具有合宪性。组织性规制和行为性规制构成对企业营业自由的限制,但限制是合宪的;协助性规制的主要宪法依据是民主权利(力)和“国家实行社会主义市场经济”的目标;伦理性规制的主要宪法依据是宪法的伦理性要求和补充实现国家安全保障任务的需要。为了保障数据的流通和利用,促进数字经济的发展,应当对数据安全风险的社会自我规制进行合宪性控制,做到合理分配规制责任、避免对社会自我规制的滥用,善用后设规制、控制协助性规制对其他主体基本权利的侵害以及以宪法凝聚伦理共识、防止伦理性规制泛化。 The social subject self-regulation of the data security risks involves a series of constitutional issues such as the allocation of risk regulation responsibilities,the boundaries of state intervention,the fundamental rights and responsibility boundaries of social subjects,so it is necessary to conduct constitutionality control.The social subject self-regulation of the data security risks in current laws mainly include organizational regulation,behavioral regulation,collaborative regulation,and ethical regulation.The four types of social subject self-regulation are constitutionality.Organizational regulation and behavioral regulation restrict the business freedom of enterprises,but the restrictions are constitutionality;The main constitutional basis of collaborative regulation is democratic rights(or democratic power)and the constitutional provision of"the state shall practice a socialist market economy";The main constitutional basis of ethical regulation is the ethical requirements of the Constitution and the need to achieve national security tasks.In order to ensure the circulation and utilization of the data and promote the development of the digital economy,the social subject self-regulation of data security risk should be constitutionality controlled.First,the regulatory responsibilities should be reasonably allocated to avoid the abuse of social subject self-regulation;Second,make good use of the post-regulation to control the violation of the fundamental rights by the collaborative regulation;Thirdly,to build ethical consensus through Constitution and prevent the generalization of ethical regulation.

作者门中敬李瑾 MEN Zhongjing;LI Jin(Law School,Shandong University,Weihai,Weihai Shandong 264209,China)

机构地区山东大学法学院(威海)

出处《法学论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第2期80-92,共13页 Legal Forum

基金教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“中国共产党领导法治工作历史进程与经验研究”(21JZD009)的阶段性研究成果。

关键词数据安全风险社会自我规制合宪性论证合宪性控制 the data security risk social subject self-regulation constitutionality argumentation constitutionality control

分类号 D921 [政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]

作者简介门中敬(1970-),男,山东诸城人,法学博士,山东大学法学院(威海)教授、博士研究生导师,山东大学国家治理研究院研究员,主要研究方向:宪法学与行政法学;李瑾(1995-),男,河北邢台人,山东大学法学院(威海)博士研究生,主要研究方向:宪法学与行政法学。