摘要
在对待不动产隐名权利人享有的民事权益能否排除强制执行的问题上,理论通说多倾向于援引现行法确立的外观主义结论,保护善意执行申请人的信赖利益,而实践中却常有裁判肯定不动产隐名权利能够产生对抗力。审视通说观点秉承的价值理念和解释方法,诸多方面可资探讨。外观主义在物权法体系中应属例外而非原则,优先维护信赖利益不等同于一概保护善意第三人。支付对价的事实、占有的公示方式与隐名权利的对抗力存在关联性,以政策目标限制民事权利应遵循一定限度。在案外人执行异议之诉中应区分对待不同情形,有条件地对不动产隐名权利加以保护。
On the issue of whether the civil rights and interests enjoyed by the real estate dormant person can be ruled out of compulsory execution,the general theory tends to invoke the appearance doctrine conclusion established by the current law to protect the trust interests of the applicant for bona fide execution.However,in practice,there are often judgments affirming that the real rights of the real estate dormant person can produce antagonism.There are many ways to explore the value concept and interpretation method of the general view.Rechtsschein Theory should be an exception rather than a principle in the system of property law.Priority to protect the interests of trust is not equal to protect the bona fide third party.The fact of payment of consideration and the way of publicity of possession are related to the antagonism of dormant rights,and the restriction of civil rights by policy objectives should follow certain limits.Different situations should be treated differently in the lawsuit of execution objection by the outsider,and the right of real estate anonymity should be protected conditionally.
作者
姚辉
阙梓冰
YAO Hui;QUE Zibing(The Research Center of Civil and Commercial Jurisprudence,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)
出处
《中国人民大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第2期125-134,共10页
Journal of Renmin University of China
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国债与合同法改革研究”(17JJD820007)
关键词
案外人执行异议之诉
外观主义
信赖利益
不动产隐名权利
The opposition of execution of nonparties
Rechtsschein Theory
Reliance interest
Right of anonymity of real estate
作者简介
姚辉:中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心主任,中国人民大学法学院教授,博士生导师;阙梓冰:中国人民大学法学院博士研究生
