摘要
自1919年西方兴起的"技术治理运动"后,在技术发展史上,技术治理在当代的理念与实践往往是通过与国家、社会的"嵌入"完成演进的,其具有"面向国家""面向社会"和"面向技术"的多重面向。三重面向的呈现与嬗变体现了技术治理在国家实践中形成了作为治理手段的技术治理、作为赋权工具的技术治理以及作为技术本身的技术治理等不同属性。随着技术治理热潮在全球范围内的渗透,技术治理也陷入"效率之殇""理性之争""组织之弊"的争论中。技术治理的局限、技术理性与价值理性的失衡以及技术治理可能对组织的渗透等形成了对技术与国家、社会互动的掣肘。由此,从技术哲学的角度构建百年技术治理的分析图景,为后续的研究探讨与治理实践提供了重要启示。
Since the "technological governance movement" in 1919, the technical governance evolved the concept and practice by the mutual embeddedness with state and society in history. The technical governance pointed to the state, society and technology aspects, which presented the different nature, such as governance means, empower tools and technology ontology. With the development of technical governance in the world, it has been a subject for debate on its efficiency, reason and organization. Specifically, the governance limitation, the reason unbalance and tissue penetration of technical governance all restricted technology application and state governance. Therefore, through structuring the overall century appearance of technical governance, it could provide important enlightenment for the follow-up research and governance practice.
作者
徐雅倩
XU Ya-qian(School of Government,Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou 510006,China)
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第6期39-44,共6页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“基于数据赋能的基层社会治理现代化研究”(20AZD088)
关键词
技术治理
国家治理
技术哲学
technical governance
state governance
technology philosophy
作者简介
徐雅倩(1995-),女,山东潍坊人,中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院博士研究生,主要研究方向:技术治理、数据治理。
