摘要
意思自治在知识产权领域多遭禁止。其原因在于,自治被认为会给国家、社会或者第三人利益造成净损害,具体体现为给第三人制造信息成本、侵占公有领域、损害消费者利益以及排除或者限制竞争。但知识产权领域的意思自治有其正当性。一是因为意思自治的正当性基础同样存在于知识产权领域。二是因为知识产权领域意思自治的社会收益可抵偿社会成本。一方面,知识产权领域的意思自治有提升社会整体福祉的潜力;另一方面,知识产权领域意思自治的社会成本并没有想象中的那般大。
Autonomy of private law in the field of intellectual property(IP)is in a precarious position.The prevalent prohibition of the autonomy of private law in IP arises from the concern that it may result in a net harm to the interests of the state,society,or third parties.This concern is reflected in the imposition of information costs for third parties,encroachment on the public domain,harm to consumer interests,and the exclusion or restriction of competition.However,the autonomy of private law in IP is still justified.Firstly,because the same legitimate foundation for autonomy of private law exists in the field of IP.Secondly,because the social benefits of autonomy of private law in IP can offset the social costs.On one hand,autonomy of private law in IP has the potential to enhance the well-being of society as a whole;on the other hand,the social costs of autonomy of private law in IP are not as great as one might presume.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第12期17-36,共20页
Intellectual Property
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“知识产权法上的权力配置研究”(项目批准号:20YJC820005)。
关键词
知识产权
意思自治
正当性
知识
社会收益
社会成本
intellectual property rights
autonomy of private law
legitimacy
knowledge
social benefits
social costs
作者简介
曾凤辰,法学博士,广东外语外贸大学法学院讲师
