摘要
我国法律在涉外协议管辖制度上规定了严格的书面形式、实际联系原则、专属管辖以及级别管辖等方面的限制条件。从意思自治原则和协议管辖的发展趋势以及我国司法主权的保护层面看,上述限制条件的正当性有所差别。其中,书面形式与级别管辖限制条件并不具有合理性;而实际联系原则与专属管辖限制条件则因涉及我国当事人和司法主权的保护问题,还应继续坚持。对于我国立法尚付阙如的弱者保护原则限制条件,为了实体正义价值目标的实现,我国立法应考虑予以明确规定。
The restrictive requirements such as rigorous formal requirement, substantial connection principle,exclusive jurisdiction or level of jurisdiction are stipulated for the foreign-related contractual jurisdiction in the Civil Procedure Law of China.The legitimacy,however,of such restrictive requirements is not the same if the development of party autonomy and contractual jurisdiction system,or protection of judicial sovereignty of China have been considered.Although requirements of substantial connection principle and exclusive jurisdiction are reasonable for they are valuable to protect Chinese parties or judicial sovereignty,it is irrational to stipulate the restrictive requirements of formal requirement or requirement of level of jurisdiction.In addition,it should be stipulated definitely the restrictive requirement of principle of protection for the weaker in contractual jurisdiction of China,which is still lacking presently.
出处
《武大国际法评论》
CSSCI
2011年第2期53-70,共18页
Wuhan University International Law Review
基金
江西省高校人文社科2011年度规划项目“外国判决承认与执行的国际合作机制研究”(项目编号:FX1106)阶段成果
关键词
协议管辖
限制条件
正当性
Contractual Jurisdiction
Restrictive Requirement
Legitimacy
