摘要
协议管辖制度集中体现在我国《民事诉讼法》第34条,该条规定了“实际联系原则”以限制当事人的意思自治。该原则在国际社会中颇具争议。我国出于维护司法主权以及管辖秩序仍然保留该原则,具有一定正当性,但立法文本规定以及司法实践的认定相当严苛,均采取了客观联系的认定标准,存在标准不明、损害当事人意思自治、与诉讼法现代化相悖等问题。在立法仍然保留实际联系原则的情况下,以主观联系认定标准取代客观联系标准能将当事人意思自治最大化,同时又能维护我国的管辖权,既能实现“自由”与“秩序”的法律价值平衡,也能与国际立法趋势接轨,提高中国法院的国际影响力。
The jurisdiction agreement system is stipulated in Article 34 of China’s Civil Procedure Law,which stipulates the principle of“actual connection”to limit party autonomy.This principle is quite controversial in the international community,but China still retains this principle out of safeguarding judicial sovereignty and jurisdictional order,which has a certain legitimacy.However,the legislative provisions and judicial practice are quite rigid.China has adopted the criteria for determining objective connections but there are some problems existing such as unclear standards,damage to the party autonomy,and contradictions with the modernization of the procedural law.In the case that legislation still retains the principle of actual connection,replacing the objective standard with the subjective standard could maximize the autonomy of the party autonomy,simultaneously,maintain China’s jurisdiction,which can not only achieve the balance of legal values of“freedom”and“order”,but also be in line with the trend of international legislation and enhance the international influence of Chinese courts.
作者
李乾通
Li Qiantong(Yantai University,Yantai,Shandong 264005)
出处
《河南司法警官职业学院学报》
2022年第4期81-86,共6页
Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
基金
山东省社科规划基金项目“中日韩数字经济合作区建设中的数据跨境流动法律问题研究”(20DFXJ05)的阶段性成果
关键词
协议管辖
意思自治
客观联系
主观联系
jurisdiction agreement
party autonomy
objective standard
subjective standard
作者简介
李乾通(1998—),男,河南新乡人,烟台大学国际法学硕士研究生。
