摘要
“概括知道”并非直接等同于网络服务提供者的主观过错,而是触发更高注意义务的条件。在“概括知道”状态下,网络服务提供者应采取合理措施控制侵权后果,未能履行注意义务将构成主观过错。“概括知道”标准回归了以注意义务为核心的间接侵权规则,能够恢复版权产业与互联网产业的利益平衡,具备合理性;赋予网络服务提供者被动、特定的审查义务并未违反审查义务豁免原则,且具备技术可行性。具体来说,短视频平台、搜索引擎和网盘三类典型网络服务提供者,在收到司法机关、行政机关、权利人包含特定作品信息的预警通知、概括通知时,应当承担关键词过滤、网站屏蔽、禁止分享、快速下线以及用户惩治等注意义务。
“General knowledge”does not directly equate to the subjective fault of Internet Service Providers(ISPs),but rather serves as a condition triggering a higher duty of care.When under a state of“general knowledge”,ISPs should take reasonable measures to control the consequences of infringement.Failure to fulfill this duty of care constitutes subjective fault.The“general knowledge”standard restores the indirect infringement rule centered on the duty of care,thereby rebalancing the interests of the copyright industry and the internet industry,which demonstrates its reasonableness.Imposing passive and specific monitoring obligations on ISPs does not violate the principle of exemption from general monitoring obligations and remains technically feasible.Specifically,three typical types of ISPs,short-video platforms,search engines,and cloud storage services,should bear the duty of care to implement measures such as keyword filtering,website blocking,sharing disabling,rapid takedown,and user sanctions upon receiving specific or general notices containing identified copyrighted work information from judicial authorities,administrative agencies,or rights holders.
出处
《经贸法律评论》
2025年第4期21-40,共20页
Business and Economic Law Review
关键词
网络著作权间接侵权
概括知道
注意义务
过滤义务
Indirect Copyright Infringement
General Knowledge
Duty of Care
Filtering Obligations
作者简介
张禹,对外经济贸易大学法学院2021级民商法学博士研究生。
