摘要
我国借鉴美国《拜杜法》的成功制度范式进行科技成果转化改革,但出现了成果转化失灵、权益配置失衡等问题,为解决上述问题,本文通过运用历史和案例相结合的研究方法,梳理《拜杜法》的立法历程,分析典型判例“斯坦福大学诉罗氏案”,可得出如下结论:该法案的法律性质属于专利法,遵循发明人主义原则,承担方获得权利的方式是先继受取得后选择权利保留;我国在移植背景、适用标准和资助关系上均有差异,应适度坚持发明人主义、改善发明人的权益分配、建构政府介入权制度来解决目前科技成果转化制度存在的问题。
China has drawn on the successful institutional paradigm of the U.S.Bayh-Dole Act to implement reforms in the commercialization of scientific and technological achievements.However,issues such as the failure of commercialization and the imbalance in rights allocation have arisen.To address these issues,this paper adopts a historical and case-based research method,reviewing the legislative history of the Bayh-Dole Act and analyzing the landmark case of"Stanford University v.Roche".The following conclusions can be drawn:the legal nature of the Act belongs to patent law,and it adheres to the principle of inventor-centrism.The way in which the contracting party obtains rights involves an initial acquisition,followed by the option to retain rights.Given the differences in the context of transplantation,applicable standards,and funding relationships,China should moderately uphold inventor-centrism,improve the distribution of inventors'rights,and establish a government intervention mechanism to resolve the current issues in the commercialization of scientific and technological achievements.
作者
王宏军
汪亚利
WANG Hongjun;WANG Yai(Faculty of Law,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300134,China)
出处
《北方工业大学学报》
2024年第6期137-145,共9页
Journal of North China University of Technology
基金
天津市哲学社会科学研究项目(TJFX17-005)。
关键词
科技成果转化
权利保留
政府放权
发明人主义
transformation of scientific and technological achievements
right reservation
government decentralization
inventorism
作者简介
通讯作者:王宏军,教授,E-mail:w17865185395@163.com。
