论帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪中“明知”的证明——从推定到综合认定被引量：6

The proof of “knowing well” in the crime of helping cybercrime delinquency——From presumption to comprehensive identification

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要关于帮信罪中“明知”的认定和证明,司法解释经历了从推定到综合认定的转向。该罪中的推定是可反驳和允许性的推定,其目的在于降低证明难度;而综合认定是一种证据审查判断方式,意在防止因证明过程简化而简单客观归罪,从而实现审慎认定。故综合认定对推定规则的适用具有限制和规范作用,在符合推定情形时,依然要用综合认定对推定的作出加以检验。推定属于证明过程的中断,并非证明方法本身,因而只能从外部有限地指导“明知”的证明。综合认定的性质及其内含的主客观相一致原则,要求对“明知”的证明采用整体主义证明模式,从整体上评价现有证据能否与“明知”的主观心理相契合。 With regards to the identification and proof of subjective “knowing well” in the crime of helping cybercrime delinquency, judicial interpretation has experienced a transition from “presumption” to “comprehensive confirmation”. The presumption in the crime of Helping Cybercrime Delinquency is rebuttable and permissive, and its purpose is to reduce the difficulty of proof. Comprehensive determination is a way of evidence review and judgment, which is intended to prevent simply objective incrimination due to the simplification of the proof process so as to achieve prudent determination. Therefore, comprehensive determination has a limiting and modifying effect on the application of the presumption rules, that is, under the condition of conforming to the presumption, the presumption should still be tested with comprehensive determination. Presumption belongs to the interruption of the process of proof, not the method of proof itself, so it can only guide the proof of “knowing well” from the outside, that is, adjust the object of proof of “knowing well” and allocate the burden of proof of“knowing well”. The nature of comprehensive identification and the principle of subjective and objective consistency within it require that the proof of “knowing well”should adopt the holistic proof mode, and evaluate whether the existing evidence can match the subjective psychology of “knowing well” as a whole.

作者何邦武胡凌宇 He Bangwu;Hu Lingyu(School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 211106,China;School of Law,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing 211815,China)

机构地区南京航空航天大学人文社会科学学院南京审计大学法学院

出处《辽宁师范大学学报（社会科学版）》 2023年第2期60-69,共10页 Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基金国家社会科学基金一般项目“网络刑事电子数据算法取证规则研究”(20BFX095) 2022年江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目“大数据侦查的原理与法律规制”(KYCX22_2133)。

关键词帮信罪 “明知” 推定综合认定 the crime of helping cybercrime delinquency “knowing well” presumption comprehensive identification

分类号 D925.2 [政治法律—诉讼法学]

作者简介何邦武(1966-),男,安徽无为人,南京航空航天大学教授,博士,主要从事证据法学、刑事诉讼法学和数字法学研究。