摘要
《民法典》第406条修改了原《物权法》第191条关于禁止抵押物转让的规则,允许抵押人在设定抵押权后转让抵押物。新规则虽然有利于促进物尽其用,鼓励交易,但是由此也可能给抵押权人监管抵押物或实现抵押权造成困难。因此有必要赋予禁止转让特约以公示能力,在违反经公示的禁止转让特约后,转让合同有效但不能发生物权变动的效力,从而兼顾物尽其用与抵押权人的权利保护。虽然《民法典》物权编删除了涤除权的规定,但是仍然可以适用《民法典》合同编中的第三人代为履行制度,并应鼓励第三人代为履行。
Article 406 of the Civil Code revised the original Article 191 of the Property Law on prohibiting the transfer of mortgaged property,allowing the mortgagor to transfer the mortgaged property after establishing the mortgage.Although the new rules are conducive to promoting the best use of the property and encouraging transactions,it may also cause difficulties for the mortgagee to supervise the mortgage or realize the mortgage.Therefore,it is necessary to give the ability to publicize the special agreement for prohibition of transfer.After the violation of the special agreement for prohibition of transfer,the transfer contract is valid but the effect of property right change cannot occur,so as to balance the use of the property with the protection of the rights of the mortgagee.Although the Civil Code property rights edition has deleted the provisions on the right of eradication,the third-party performance system in the Civil Code Contracts Edition can still be applied,and third parties should be encouraged to perform on their behalf.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第1期39-46,共8页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金重大规划项目(18ZDA143)“人格权保护立法研究”。
关键词
民法典
抵押权
抵押物转让
禁止让与特约
Civil Code
mortgage
transfer of mortgage
prohibition of assignment
作者简介
王利明,中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心研究员,中国人民大学法学院教授。
