摘要
对于履行费用过高缺乏具体的判断标准与方法是长期以来困扰我国理论界与实务界的难题之一。通过实证研究的方法可以发现,司法实务中普遍存在裁判标准不一、解除权误用、与标的不适于强制履行混同等情形。学界对此的回应主要是严重不成比例说,但是该说却因标准模糊,无法为个案提供妥当的判断方法。从我国司法实务中对履行费用过高条款的运用可以发现,单一要素的衡量方法无法为其提供妥当的判断标准。对此,应当引入动态体系的判断方法,就债权人的牺牲限度、履行利益与给付费用之间的不均衡程度、替代损害赔偿的可能性三者之间进行动态衡量之后得出结论。
The lack of specific criteria and methods for judging high performance costs has long been a problem in China s theoretical and practical circles.Through the method of empirical research,it is found that there are many problems in judicial practice,such as different judgment standards,misuse of the right of rescission,and confusion with the subject matter which is not suitable for compulsory performance.The academic response to this is mainly serious disproportional theory,but because the standard is vague,it can not provide a proper way to judge the case.It can be found from the application of the clause of too high performance cost in China s judicial practice that the measurement method of single factor can not provide appropriate judgment standard for it.In this regard,the judgment method of dynamic system should be introduced,and the conclusion should be drawn after the dynamic measurement of the limit of the creditor s sacrifice,the imbalance between the performance interests and the payment expenses,and the possibility of substituting for damages.
出处
《财经法学》
2020年第6期83-97,共15页
Law and Economy
关键词
费用过高
拒绝履行
履行不能
动态体系
强制履行
excessive cost
refusal to perform
impossibility of performance
dynamic system
compulsory performance
作者简介
时明涛,浙江大学光华法学院博士研究生。
