摘要
"侵外"管辖的正当性来源于国际私法的精神实质。在跨境侵权纠纷中,知识产权权利人的合法利益获得充分救济依赖于知识产权的消极域外效力,而"侵外"管辖具有不可或缺的地位和作用,其有助于减少权利人的诉累并节约司法资源。"侵外"管辖主要存在4种类型的管辖法院:(1)被控侵权人居所地法院;(2)权利人居所地法院;(3)侵权行为实施地法院;(4)协议管辖的法院。法院对于注册性知识产权有效性事项作为主要问题的诉讼应采取专属管辖。侵权的特殊地域管辖适用于涉外知识产权侵权时需要对管辖权施加地域限制。被控侵权人之一的居所地法院合并管辖多人共同侵犯多国知识产权应受到一定的限制。
The justification for jurisdiction over foreign IP rights is rooted in the essence of the private international law.In the context of cross-border infringement,the full remedy for the IP proprietor relies on passive extraterritoriality of IP,and the jurisdiction over foreign IP rights plays an essential role,which reduces the difficulty of taking actions and saves judicial resources.Courts exercising jurisdiction over foreign IP rights can be classified into four categories:a.court where the alleged infringer is a habitual resident;b.court where the proprietor is a habitual resident;c.court where the harmful conduct occurs;d.court based on the choice of the parties.Court should take exclusive jurisdiction over the case in which validity of registered IP rights is the main issue.Territorial limitation should be imposed on special jurisdiction of IP infringement.There should be a limitation to some extent for the courts of the State where any of the accused infringers is a habitual resident to exercise the relevant jurisdiction.
作者
阮开欣
RUAN Kai-xin(School of Intellectual Property Rights,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)
出处
《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期62-71,共10页
Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition
基金
华东政法大学科学研究项目“网络环境中知识产权的国际私法问题研究”(19HZK007)
关键词
外国知识产权
“侵外”管辖
专属管辖
礼让原则
intellectual property rights
jurisdiction over foreign IP rights
exclusive jurisdiction
principle of comity
作者简介
阮开欣,男,上海人,华东政法大学副研究员,博士,研究方向为知识产权国际保护、版权法、商标法。
