摘要
共谋共同正犯是一个存在争议的概念,根据共谋共同正犯理论,单纯的“谋议者”要按照“正犯”进行定罪、处罚。共同意思主体说、行为支配说等学说都无法充分说明共谋共同正犯的理论依据,需要引入“分工说”,在“不法”层面认定犯罪,在“有责”层面量刑。鉴于恐怖活动犯罪的法律性和超法律性,有必要在恐怖活动犯罪中适用共谋共同正犯概念。恐怖活动犯罪应该作广义理解,不但包括法定的恐怖活动犯罪和实质的恐怖活动犯罪,也包括极端主义犯罪。在认定共谋共同正犯中“谋议者”在共同犯罪中的作用时,要区分主观和客观两种导致没有实施犯罪实行行为的原因,真正做到罪责刑相一致。
Complicity in common principal criminal is a controversial concept. According to the theory of complicity in common principal criminal, pure “planners” should be convicted and punished according to the “principal criminal”. The theory of the subject of the common will, the theory of the domination of behavior and other theories can not fully explain the theoretical basis for the conspiracy of common principal criminals, so we need to introduce the theory of division of labor, identify the crime at the level of “lawlessness”, and measure the punishment at the level of “responsibility”. In view of the legal and extra-legal nature of the crimes of terrorist activities, it is necessary to apply the concept of co-principal criminals in the crimes of terrorist activities. The crime of terrorist activities should be broadly understood, including not only legal crime of terrorist activities and substantive crime of terrorist activities, but also extremist crime. In determining the role of the “planner” in the joint crime, we should distinguish between subjective and objective reasons that lead to the non-execution of the crime, and make the guilt and punishment consistent.
作者
王林
WANG Lin(Northwest University of Political Science and Law,Xi'an,Shanxi 710122,China)
出处
《时代法学》
2019年第4期110-116,F0003,共8页
Presentday Law Science
基金
2017年度中国法学会课题“反恐斗争中我国安置教育的体系构建研究”(项目编号:CLS(2017)C18)的阶段性成果
关键词
共谋共同正犯
恐怖活动犯罪
分工说
common principal
crimes of terrorist activities
the theory of division of labor
作者简介
王林,男,西北政法大学反恐怖主义法学院讲师,法学博士,杭州市西湖区人民检察院检察长助理(挂职),主要研究方向:刑法学。
