摘要
制度化概念充满歧义,不同学者与学派的理解视角、层次、"时态"、"语态"和侧重各有不同。尽管如此,制度化仍然具备一些普适性的意涵,它体现的是从规则到行为等一系列社会范畴、现象实现规范化、常态化、通约化的过程,具有约束性、持续性和扩散性等内容指向。根据制度的三大基础要素在"秩序基础"以及"系列指标"维度上的区别,可将制度化划分为规制型制度化、契约型制度化和建构型制度化等三种类型。好的制度化是规训功能的提供者,是持续性和扩散性的保障者,是稳定性的生产者,而不当的制度化会异化为"仪式化",或者导致"脱耦"现象,使制度化提供的稳定性成为一种间断平衡。
The conception of institutionalization was variously understood by different scholars and schools in different dimensions as follows： perspective, hierarchy, ＂tense＂, ＂voice＂ and emphasis. Though the definition of institutionalization is skimble-scamble, it should have some general implications. Institutionalization should describe a process that category and phenomenon from rules to behavior in society was standardized, continuous and commensurable, and have three dimensions： constraints, sustainability and diffusivity. According to the distinction on the order foundation and index of the three basic elements of institution, there can be three molds of institutionalization： regulative, contractive, and constructive. Good institutionalization is the provider of regulation and the indemnitor of continuity and diffusivity. Because of the structural deficiency and primordial deficiency, misconducted institutionalization will result in its alienation--ritualization and decoupling （which makes the stability of institutionalization punctuated equilibrium）.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期109-117,共9页
Academic Monthly
基金
国家社会科学基金重大招标项目"地方政府社会管理创新的制度化研究"(13&ZD040)的阶段性成果
关键词
制度化
内涵
类型
生成机制
评价
institutionalization, connotation, mold, formation mechanism, evaluation
作者简介
郁建兴，浙江大学公共管理学院教授（浙江杭州310058）；
秦上人，浙江大学公共管理学院博士研究生（浙江杭州310058）o
