摘要
交付公示作为被继受而来的德国物权法原则之一,自清末被传统中国学界接受以来,散见于诸多著作、教材之中。但无论是现实交付,还是观念交付,都不可能实现动产物权变动的公示,动产物权本身是否可以被公示也值得怀疑。交付公示原则的确立有特定的意志主义方法论背景,而实践面向的检讨则有助于形成新的制度设计理念。
Delivery public notice is a concept imported from German property law since the end of 19th Century, which has been widely accepted by Chinese academics and frequently cited in literature. However, either physical delivery or constructive delivery cannot attain the purpose of public notice for the change of title It is still debatable about whether the title of property can be publicized. Establishing delivery principle is heavily influenced by particular formation of new institution concepts methodology, while the review about the practice is public notice good for the
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第4期49-61,共13页
Modern Law Science
关键词
交付
占有
交付公示
现实交付
观念交付
delivery
possession
delivery public notice
physical delivery
constructive delivery
作者简介
聂卫锋（1978-），男，河南济源人，讲师，中国政法大学博士后科研流动站研究人员。
