期刊文献+

从博雅到自由——博雅教育概念的历史语义学分析 被引量:24

From Genteel to Liberating——A Historical Semantic Analysis of the Concept of Liberal Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 现代的博雅教育或自由教育(liberal education)概念源自对古希腊术语"Eleutherion epistemon"和古罗马术语"Artes liberales"、"Liberaliter educatione"的翻译,但这个术语本身经历了三次大的转型或变迁。当英国人在16、17世纪通过翻译创造出"博雅教育"(liberal education)这个概念时,自由人/奴隶之间的两分法被绅士阶层/非绅士阶层之间的两分法所取代,liberal的语义也从"适合于自由人的"转向"适合于绅士的";到18世纪末、19世纪初,这个概念又增加了一层新的语义,意指"非专业的教育",博雅教育概念逐渐与新出现的通识教育概念合流;从19世纪末开始,博雅教育从针对绅士阶层的教育变成了对所有公民的通识性教育,并日益和自由主义的意识形态勾连在一起,liberal的语义也从博雅转向了自由,博雅教育变成了自由教育。 The idea of liberal education dates back to Aristotle's "eleutherion epistemon" and Cicero's "artes liberales". In the Middle Ages, this idea was embodied as "seven liberal arts". From the seventeenth century on, the concept of "artes liberales" married the idea of "gentleman" and "gentleman-scholar", and gave birth to the modern idea of "liberal education" in the eighteenth and nineteenth century Britain, which emphasized both "general" and "genteel", but the semantic focus shifted more and more from "genteel" to "general". In the twentieth century, liberal education lost its connection with "gentleman" and became the general education for all citizens, increasingly linked with the ideology of liberalism. Meanwhile, its semantic meaning changed form "learned and genteel" to "free" or "liberating".
作者 沈文钦
出处 《清华大学教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期39-48,共10页 Tsinghua Journal of Education
关键词 历史语义学 博雅教育 概念变迁 语义分析 historical semantics liberal education~ conceptual change semantic analysis
作者简介 沈文钦,广西北流人,北京大学教育学院副教授,研究方向为现代大学制度与观念的历史比较分析、博士生教育与高层次人才培养.
  • 相关文献

参考文献61

  • 1Kimball, B. A. , Orators and Philosophers : A History of the Idea of Liberal Education (New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1995).
  • 2Maunzlo Vlroh. "The Revolution in the Concept of Politics,"Political Theory 20, 3 (1992) :473 - 495.
  • 3Bartelson, Jens, A genealogy of sovereignty (New York : Cambridge University Press, 1995).
  • 4Oelkers, Jurgen. Democracy and the Two Dogmas of Education (Ms. Zfirich,2004).
  • 5Oelkers, Jurgen. "The Origin of the Concept of 'Allgemeinbildung' in 18th Century Germany. Studies, "Philosophy and Education 18 (/999) :25 - 40.
  • 6Hamann, Julian, "Bildung in German human sciences: The discursive transformation of a concept," History of the Human Sciences 24, 5 (2011) :48 - 72.
  • 7田正平,章小谦.中国教育者概念从传统到现代的演变——从“教官”到“教师”称谓变化的历史考察[J].社会科学战线,2007(1):245-251. 被引量:9
  • 8田正平,章小谦.中国教育概念史研究刍议[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007,46(5):132-135. 被引量:13
  • 9田正平,章小谦.“老师”称谓源流考[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007,37(3):61-67. 被引量:21
  • 10章小谦.“先生”考[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2007,25(4):73-78. 被引量:6

二级参考文献34

  • 1田正平,章小谦.“老师”称谓源流考[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007,37(3):61-67. 被引量:21
  • 2罗竹风.汉语大词典[M].上海:汉语大词典出版社,1997.430.
  • 3璩鑫圭编.中国近代教育史资料汇编鸦片战争时期教育[Z].上海:上海教育出版社,1990..
  • 4马西尼著 黄河清译.现代汉语词汇的形成—十九世纪汉语外来词研究[M].上海,汉语大词典出版社,1997..
  • 5颜元.颜元集[M].中华书局,1980..
  • 6.全唐文·卷七十[Z].,..
  • 7.全唐文·卷一百十六[Z].,..
  • 8王阳明.王阳明集·卷十八[M].,..
  • 9汉斯-格奥尔格·加达默尔.真理与方法[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1999.
  • 10《孟子》[M].

共引文献62

同被引文献265

引证文献24

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部