企业内部知识转移中个体中心度、吸收能力对绩效的影响被引量：19

Intrafirm Knowledge Transfer: Effects of Centrality and Absorptive Capacity on Individual Performance

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要以往关于社会资本对企业内部知识转移影响的研究,通常提取一些基本的人口统计学特征作为控制变量,考察联系特征和结构特征对知识转移的影响,而对吸收能力的讨论却较少。本文将个体在社会网络中的结构特征和个体吸收能力结合起来,分别考察在情感网络和咨询网络中,个体的中心度以及中心度与吸收能力的交叉对个体绩效的影响。结果发现情感网络对个体绩效没有显著影响。在咨询网络中,个体出度对绩效有正作用,而且该作用依赖于个体吸收能力。 Social capital has an effect on intrafirm knowledge transfer. Past literatures usually focus on the effects of the tie and structural characteristics of the Social capital on the knowledge transfer, controlling individual＇s demographic characteristics. Although absorptive capacity is emphasized in knowledge transfer, it is seldom taken into account in social network analysis literature. This paper combined individual structural characteristics with absorptive capacity. The effects of centrality in friendship and advice networks as well as the interaction of centrality and absorptive capacity in advice network on individual performance are examined. Analysis showed that friendship network has no significant effect on performance. And individual indegree in advice network has certain negative effect on performance while outdegree has a significant positive effect on performance. Among the interaction variables, the interaction of centrality and absorptive capacity in advice network has some effect on individual performance.

作者秦令华殷瑾井润田

机构地区电子科技大学经济与管理学院

出处《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期5-9,共5页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(70872017) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-06-0804) 教育部聘请外籍教师重点资助项目(2008-271) 教育部人文社会科学一般资助项目(06JC630004)

关键词中心度吸收能力 QAP centrality absorptive capacity QAP

分类号 C936 [经济管理—管理学]

作者简介秦令华（1981-），女，江西南昌人，电子科技大学经济与管理学院博士研究生，研究方向：组织行为学。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1Grant R. Toward a knowledge,based theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1966, 17 (Special Issue) : 109 - 122.
2Liebeskind JP. Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm [J].Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17 (Special Issue) : 93 - 108.
3Pelled LH. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory[J]. Organization Science, 1996, 7: 615-631.
4Cohen BP, Zhou X. Status processes in enduring work groups[J]. American Sociological Review, 1991, 56:179 - 188.
5Krackhardt D. The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations [ A ]. In: Nohria N, Eccles R. Organizations and Networks: Structure, Form, and Action [ C]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992. 216 - 239.
6Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2) : 242 - 266.
7Lin N. Social Capital[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
8Tsai W. Social structure of " coopetition " within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing[J].Organization Science, 2002, 13(2): 179- 190.
9Brown JS, Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation [J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1):40- 57.
10Reagans B, Zuckerman EW. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams[]]. Organization Science, 2001, 12 (4) : 502 - 517.

二级参考文献50

1Argote L,McEvily B,Reagans R.Managing knowledge in organizations:An integrative framework and review of emerging themes[J].Management Science,2003,49:571-582.
2Leonard-Barton D.Core capabilities and core rigidities:A paradox in managing new product development[J].Strategic Management Journal,1992,13:111-125.
3Spender J C.Making knowledge:The basis of a dynamic theory of the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(S2):45-62.
4Drucker P F.Post-capitalist society[M].Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann,1993.
5Nonaka I,Toyama R,Nagata A.A firm as a knowledge-creating entity:A new perspective on the theory of the firm[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2000,9(1):1-20.
6Nonaka I,Konno N.The concept of 'Ba':Building a foundation for knowledge creation[J].California Management Review,1998,40(3):40-54.
7Senge P M.The fifth discipline:The art and practice of the learning organization[M].New York:Doubleday Currency,1990.
8Moran P,Ghoshal S.Theories of economic organization:The case for realism and balance[J].Academy of Management Review,1996,21(1):58-72.
9Nonaka I,Takeuchi H.The knowledge-creating company[M].London,UK:Oxford University Press,1995.
10von Krogh G.Care in knowledge creation[J].Catifornia Management Review,1998,40(3):133-153.