摘要
主张财产性利益是诈骗罪的对象,具有合目的性与具体的妥当性,并不违反罪刑法定原则(不属于类推解释);但是,只有当某种利益内容属于财产权,具有管理可能性与转移可能性,客观上具有经济价值,被害人丧失该利益必然同时导致财产损害时,该利益才能成为诈骗罪对象的财产性利益;至于债权凭证、财物的返还请求权、货款请求权、财物的交付"请求权"、债务的延缓履行是否刑法上的财产性利益,则需要具体分析。
The allegation that the interest of property is the object of the crime of swindling accords with the aim of the criminal law, has the concrete appropriateness, and does not violate the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime (not belonging to analogical interpretation); however, the interest could not satisfy the elements of the interest of the property which is the object of the crime of swindling unless its content is part of the property right, has the quality of manageability and transferability, possesses economic value, and inevitably leads to property detriment simultaneously when the victim is deprived of the interest. As to the certificate of creditor's rights, the claim for money or property's restitution, the claim for payment, the claim for money or property's delivery, and the deferred performance, whether all of the above are the interest of property in the criminal law or not, need specific analysis under different conditions.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第3期72-82,共11页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金项目<金融诈骗犯罪疑难问题研究>的阶段性成果之一。
