摘要
《民法典》第997条与《专利法》第66条等三个条文高度一致,表明它指向的是诉前行为保全,但作为例外,对家暴行为应适用人身安全保护令。"立法说明"对此也明确予以肯定。保全程序属广义的非讼程序。基于《民法典》第995条,当事人既可提起行为给付之诉,以获得终局禁令,也可在诉前或诉中,依《民事诉讼法》申请诉前或诉中禁令。当事人获得诉前禁令后并非总是要提起后续诉讼,但也不应期待通过极简的程序获得长期甚至永久禁令。禁令的主文应恰当表述,以使其有较宽的既判力客观范围。并非实体法中的每个规范都是实体规范。
The article 997 of the civil code is in high agreement with Article 66 of the patent law,which indicates that it points to the pre-litigation injunction,but as an exception,the personal safety protection order should be applied to the domestic violence."The legislative statement"also clearly affirmed this.The procedure of preservation is a general non-litigation procedure.According to Article 995 of the civil code,the parties may not only file the action of payment,but also apply for injunction before or during the lawsuit according to the civil procedure law.After the parties obtain the pre-litigation injunction,they do not always have to bring follow-up proceedings,but they should not expect to obtain a long-term or permanent injunction through the minimalist procedure.The main text of the injunction should be properly stated so that it has a wider objective scope of res judicata.Not every norm in the substantive law is an substantive norm,and each claim for performance of the act can be the basis of the substantive law of the final or temporary injunction.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第6期119-129,共11页
Law Review
关键词
人格权禁令
诉前行为保全
行为给付之诉
不作为请求权
Personality Right Injunction
Pre-Litigation Conduct Preservation
Action for Payment of Behavior
Right to Claim for Inaction
作者简介
严仁群,南京大学法学院教授。
