合作治理抑或集体无为?基层政社协同的策略选择与制度后果

Collaborative Governance or Collective Inaction?Strategic Choices and Institutional Consequences of Grassroots Collaboration between Government and Social Organizations

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要聚焦政府购买服务中的政社协同机制,基于长三角多县域案例比较,文章揭示了政社协同从“合作治理”转向“集体无为”的内在逻辑。研究发现,条块政府和社会组织基于信息掌控、时间压力及期望差异形成动态行动策略,带来不同的制度结果。在谈判博弈下,条块政府策略性选择“有限次谈判”或“无限期谈判”,而社会组织发展出多样化应变策略以达成合作增益。然而,当项目治理结构变化导致政社互动进入非谈判博弈阶段后,职能部门“强制履约”、属地政府“名义履约”、社会组织“形式履约”的行动策略共同形塑了集体无作为的实践悖论,导致合作治理效能的耗散。文章据此提出完善政社互动的友善制度,构建基于信任的项目内外协同来破解当下困境。 As an innovative mechanism for complex social governance,grassroots collaborative governance has attracted significant attention.One of its key aspects is the effective collaboration between the government and social organizations.Focusing on the core domain of the project-based system for community services,this article examines the evolutionary process of grassroots collaboration between the government and social organizations from negotiation games to non-negotiation games through case studies of social organizations participating in grassroots governance across multiple counties in the Yangtze River Delta.The study finds that in negotiation games,Tiao and Kuai governments strategically choose"limited-time negotiations"or"indefinite negotiations"based on information control,time pressure,and expectation differences,while social organizations develop diversified adaptive strategies to achieve collaborative gains.In the non-negotiation game stage,the institutional logics of"compulsive compliance"by functional departments,"nominal compliance"by local governments,and"formal compliance"by social organizations collectively shape the practical paradox of collective inaction,leading to the dissipation of governance efficiency in government-social organization collaboration.The article concludes by proposing the construction of a friendly institutional framework for government-social organization collaboration.This framework aims to foster collaboration both within and beyond individual projects,thereby breaking the current impasse in grassroots partnerships.

作者严骏夫 YAN Junfu

机构地区上海应用技术大学社会工作系

出处《学习与实践》北大核心 2025年第10期106-116,共11页 Study and Practice

基金国家社会科学基金青年项目“治理共同体视域下社区服务项目制的协同困境与机制创新研究”(项目编号:21CSH066) 国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国特色社会工作的主体自觉与自主知识体系建构研究”(项目编号:23BSH013)。

关键词政社协同合作治理集体无为策略选择制度后果 Government-social organization collaboration Collaborative governance Collective inaction Strategic choice Institutional consequences

分类号 C916 [经济管理]

作者简介严骏夫,上海应用技术大学社会工作系校聘副教授,上海,201418。