摘要
基于2003—2024年CNKI文献的CiteSpace分析显示:我国生态环境法典编纂研究呈现阶段性增长特征,历经起步、增长、极速增长至拐点期演化;核心作者与机构引领研究方向,关键词共现形成“一主一副一轴”结构。研究聚焦基础理论、结构体系、体系定位、比较法借鉴、与《民法典》《刑法》衔接六大方面,且呈现四大发展态势:第一,超越功能主义,从继续推进已有初步共识、深入推动尚未形成共识和持续增进尚未展开探讨的基础理论研究三方面进一步强化理论阐释研究;第二,跨越还原主义,从更持续强化体系定位的衔接性、更全面加强结构体系的协调性和更系统增强具体规范的衔接与协调三方面进一步加强研究内容衔接的整体性;第三,反对本本主义,从更科学地界定生态环境法典“本土化”的范畴、更灵活辩证借鉴域外生态环境法典编纂经验和更切实合理地与我国环境治理的客观实际有机结合三方面进一步关注比较研究内容的本土化;第四,避免保守主义,从研究前沿性政策规范的生态环境法典化表达、推动数字技术与生态环境法典编纂的同频共振两方面进一步追求研究内容的时代性。研究旨在为生态环境法典编纂提供理论支持,推动生态环境法典编纂逐步向深层次发展,最终服务于生态环境可持续发展的法治目标。
A CiteSpace-based bibliometric and visualization analysis of CNKI literature spanning 2003-2024 indicates that scholarly research on China's ecological and environmental codification has exhibited distinct phase-based growth patterns.Initially emerging during the early 2000s,this field has progressively evolved through phases of gradual growth,accelerated expansion,and eventual inflection point stabilization.Core authors and institutional contributors have significantly shaped the research trajectory,with keyword co-occurrence analysis revealing a structured framework characterized by“one-primary,one-secondary,and one-axis”thematic clusters.The research corpus centers on six interrelated domains:theoretical foundations,structural frameworks,systemic positioning,comparative legal references,and alignment with both Civil Code ofthe People's Republic of China and Criminal Law of the People's Republic ofChina.Firstly,to transcend functionalist limitations,scholars have emphasized tripartite theoretical advancements:consolidating existing consensus,addressing unresolved theoretical divides,and exploring under-examined foundational paradigms.Secondly,moving beyond reductionist approaches,researchers have advocated for holistic integration by reinforcing cross-system alignment,enhancing structural coherence,and systematically harmonizing normative provisions.Thirdly,in rejecting dogmatic“bookish”tendencies,the literature stresses contextualized indigenization through three strategies:scientifically defining the scope of localized adaptation,dialectically adapting foreign codification experiences,and grounding innovations in China's empirical environmental governance realities.Fourthly,to avoid conservatism,scholars have prioritized contemporary relevance by incorporating cutting-edge policy norms into codification frameworks and fostering synergistic intersections between digital technological advancements and codification methodologies.This multidimensional research agenda not only provides critical theoretical scaffolding for China's ecological and environmental codification project but also propels the field toward deeper analytical sophistication.Ultimately,these scholarly endeavors aim to advance the statutory protection of ecosystems through innovative legal architecture,thereby serving the broader societal objective of sustainable environmental governance underpinned by robust legal frameworks.
作者
王彬辉
梁嘉铭
WANG Binhui;LIANG Jiaming(Law School,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,Hunan,China)
出处
《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2025年第3期1-13,共13页
Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“加快推进生态环境治理体系和治理能力现代化研究”(20&ZD091)
国家留学基金委2024年创新型人才国际合作培养项目(202406720002)
湖南省教育厅创新项目“全民所有自然资源资产损害民事责任研究”(CX20240485)。
关键词
生态环境
法典编纂
环境法学
《民法典》
CITESPACE
ecological environment
codification
environmental law
Civil Code ofthe People's Republic of China
CiteSpace
作者简介
第一作者:王彬辉(1974-),女,教授,博士生导师,主要从事环境与资源保护法学研究。
