摘要
加密货币在监管引导和私法保护双重缺失的状态下肆意发展十余载。中国目前针对加密货币治理存在政策与司法实践的矛盾,在金融方面禁止之余,司法案例中却偶尔有承认加密货币私法权利的情况出现。选择何种明确的加密货币治理模式是亟待解决的问题。作为加密货币发行首选地之一,美国推出了关于加密货币的立法草案。美国加密货币立法中明确加密货币的财产属性,同时按照加密货币的不同功能将其监管职责分而治之。根据美国对加密货币治理模式的提炼与总结,本文结合中国法律特色与司法实践,为中国加密货币治理提出“全面禁止模式”与“循序渐进模式”。
Cryptocurrency develops wantonly in the absence of both regulatory guidance and private law protection for over ten years.China is currently stuck at the contradiction between policies and judicial practices in cryptocurrency governance.What kind of clear cryptocurrency governance mode is the problem that needs to be solved.The United States is one of the first choices for ICO.The Congress has introduced the Crypto-Currency Act of 2020.The Crypto-Currency Act of 2020 defines the cryptocurrency as commodity.The US case law clarifies that the cryptocurrency is the object of property rights.According to the United States’cryptocurrency governance model,combined with the legal characteristics and judicial practice of China,China’s proposal of cryptocurrency governace is finally introduced.
出处
《国际商务研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第2期88-99,共12页
International Business Research
关键词
加密货币法律属性
加密货币监管
加密货币立法
加密货币
legal attribute of cryptocurrency
cryptocurrency regulation
cryptocurrency legislation
cryptocurrency
作者简介
梁庭瑜,江苏师范大学法学院讲师,研究方向:国际私法。
